From: Dongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Dongsheng Yang <dongsheng081251@gmail.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <mingo@redhat.com>,
<bsegall@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: Distinguish sched_wakeup event when wake up a task which did schedule out or not.
Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 17:58:28 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53708D34.1070600@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140512064730.GI30445@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On 05/12/2014 03:47 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 02:52:24PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>> On Sun, 11 May 2014 18:35:31 +0200
>> Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
>> I believe you may be misunderstanding Dongsheng. It has nothing to do
>> with the wake condition. But the "success" is basically saying, "did I
>> move the task on to the run queue?". That's a relevant piece of
>> information that the wake up event isn't currently showing.
>>
>> Let me ask you this; with Donsheng's patch, will there ever be a
>> sched_switch event when the wakeup event sees 'false' and the
>> sched_switch event see the task with a state other than "R"? And if so,
>> how did the task doing the wakeup event, wake up that task?
> But that has nothing what so fucking ever to do with 'success'. Reusing
> that trace argument for something entirely different is just retarded.
Hi Peter,
we need to distinguish the true_wakeup and false_wakeup because
we want to know the timestamp when a task moved into runqueue.
Then we can calculate the latency time in perf sched latency command.
Without this patch, we will always get wakeup events with .success==true,
and we can not get the accurate time of task on run queue waiting for
cpu.
In original design of sched:sched_wakeup, actually was what I described
in commit message, .success==true means task go into run queue. And
perf-sched.c does only care events with this type:
/* Note for later, it may be interesting to observe the failing
cases */
if (!success)
return 0;
And if scheduler raise an wakeup event with .success=true in
ttwu_do_wakeup(),
perf sched latency will find the last state of this task is not out of
run queue. Then
it will be confused and print a bug message for it.
# perf sched latency|tail
bash:3498 | 0.785 ms | 1 | avg: 0.000 ms |
max: 0.000 ms | max at: 0.000000 s
bash:3600 | 0.522 ms | 1 | avg: 0.000 ms |
max: 0.000 ms | max at: 0.000000 s
bash:3570 | 0.295 ms | 1 | avg: 0.000 ms |
max: 0.000 ms | max at: 0.000000 s
bash:3581 | 0.288 ms | 1 | avg: 0.000 ms |
max: 0.000 ms | max at: 0.000000 s
bash:3594 | 0.286 ms | 1 | avg: 0.000 ms |
max: 0.000 ms | max at: 0.000000 s
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL: | 2768.420 ms | 17331 |
---------------------------------------------------
INFO: 0.482% state machine bugs (82 out of 17008)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-12 9:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-15 12:32 [PATCH 0/8] perf sched: Add trace event for sched wait Dongsheng Yang
2014-04-15 12:32 ` [PATCH 1/8] sched & trace: Add a trace event for wait Dongsheng Yang
2014-04-15 13:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-16 14:23 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-04-15 12:32 ` [PATCH 2/8] sched/wait: Add trace point before add task into wait queue Dongsheng Yang
2014-04-15 12:32 ` [PATCH 3/8] sched/wait: Use __add_wait_queue{_tail}_exclusive() as possible Dongsheng Yang
2014-04-15 13:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-16 9:51 ` Dongsheng Yang
2014-04-15 12:32 ` [PATCH 4/8] sched/core: Skip wakeup when task is already running Dongsheng Yang
2014-04-15 13:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-16 10:22 ` Dongsheng Yang
2014-04-22 11:56 ` Dongsheng Yang
2014-04-22 13:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-22 17:10 ` bsegall
2014-04-22 17:53 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-04-22 18:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-05 6:32 ` Dongsheng Yang
2014-05-05 6:34 ` [PATCH] sched: Move the wakeup tracepoint from ttwu_do_wakeup() to ttwu_activate() Dongsheng Yang
2014-05-05 14:00 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-05-06 0:19 ` Dongsheng Yang
2014-05-06 0:26 ` Dongsheng Yang
2014-05-06 2:06 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-05-06 1:29 ` Dongsheng Yang
2014-05-06 1:52 ` [PATCH] sched: Distinguish sched_wakeup event when wake up a task which did schedule out or not Dongsheng Yang
2014-05-09 0:16 ` Dongsheng Yang
2014-05-09 1:27 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-05-10 15:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
[not found] ` <536F90BE.2080806@gmail.com>
2014-05-11 15:24 ` Fwd: " Dongsheng Yang
2014-05-11 16:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-11 18:52 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-05-12 6:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-12 8:58 ` Dongsheng Yang [this message]
2014-05-12 14:09 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-05-12 15:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-12 15:17 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-05-12 15:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-15 12:32 ` [PATCH 5/8] perf tools: record and process sched:sched_wait event Dongsheng Yang
2014-04-15 12:32 ` [PATCH 6/8] perf tools: add missing event for perf sched record Dongsheng Yang
2014-04-15 12:32 ` [PATCH 7/8] perf tools: Adapt the TASK_STATE_TO_CHAR_STR to new value in kernel space Dongsheng Yang
2014-04-15 12:32 ` [PATCH 8/8] perf tools: Clarify the output of perf sched map Dongsheng Yang
2014-04-15 13:54 ` [PATCH 0/8] perf sched: Add trace event for sched wait Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-16 10:28 ` Dongsheng Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53708D34.1070600@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dongsheng081251@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox