Re: [PATCH v1.1 2/16 update 3] arcmsr: Adding code to support MSI-X interrupt

[Tomas Henzl <thenzl@redhat.com>]

On 05/12/2014 01:55 PM, ching wrote:
> Hi Tomas,
>
> Thanks for your remind again.
> The patch 17/17 will be as following.

Hi Ching,
I think we have messed up this thread a bit. Please repost the 2/16 with fixes related only to msi-x,
this is the original 2/26 patch update with fixes directly related to it - free_irq + related fixes to error path.
This should create a clear situation so James knows what he should take

For the other changes - moving scsi_scan_host + flush_work etc. either create a 17/16 patch
or  wait until the 16/16 set is taken and then post a new patch.

 out_free_sysfs:
-scsi_host_remove:
-	scsi_remove_host(host);
-RAID_controller_stop:
+	del_timer_sync(&acb->eternal_timer);
+	flush_scheduled_work();

Btw, isn't flush_work(&acb->arcmsr_d..  better here?
and if so the block looks almost identical to what is in arcmsr_shutdown,
can we use it instead?

Thanks,
Tomas

>  	arcmsr_stop_adapter_bgrb(acb);
>  	arcmsr_flush_adapter_cache(acb);
> +	arcmsr_free_irq(pdev, acb);
> +scsi_host_remove:
> +	scsi_remove_host(host);
> +free_ccb_pool:
>  	arcmsr_free_ccb_pool(acb);
>  free_hbb_mu:
>  	arcmsr_free_mu(acb);
>
>
>
> On Fri, 2014-05-09 at 13:15 +0200, Tomas Henzl wrote:
>> On 05/08/2014 01:37 PM, ching wrote:
>>> Hi Tomas,
>>>
>>> Thanks for your suggestion.
>>> I will add a new patch 17/17 at last.
>> This additional patch was meant for moving the scsi_scan_host, because it's
>> nor related to the ms-x interrupts. Probably  the maintainer will prefer
>> a single patch which changes msi-x at once, I don't care.
>> To the patch below - you should also free the allocated irqs as I wrote previously.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Tomas
>>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html