public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10 V2] workqueue: destroy_worker() should destroy idle workers only
Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 14:08:11 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5371B6CB.3090301@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140512210811.GB18959@mtj.dyndns.org>

On 05/13/2014 05:08 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 02:56:14PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
>> @@ -1692,9 +1691,8 @@ static struct worker *alloc_worker(void)
>>   * create_worker - create a new workqueue worker
>>   * @pool: pool the new worker will belong to
>>   *
>> - * Create a new worker which is bound to @pool.  The returned worker
>> - * can be started by calling start_worker() or destroyed using
>> - * destroy_worker().
>> + * Create a new worker which is attached to @pool.
>> + * The new worker must be started and enter idle via start_worker().
> 
> Please always fill the comment paragarphs to 75 column or so.  Also,

> do we even need start_worker() separate anymore?  Maybe we can just
> fold alloc_and_create_worker() into alloc_worker()?

We should do this I think. but it is just cleanup, I will do it after
this core patchset is accepted.

> 
>> @@ -1815,6 +1812,7 @@ static int create_and_start_worker(struct worker_pool *pool)
>>   * @worker: worker to be destroyed
>>   *
>>   * Destroy @worker and adjust @pool stats accordingly.
>> + * The worker should be idle.
> 
> Ditto about filling.
> 
> Looks good otherwise.
> 
> Thanks.
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2014-05-13  6:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 78+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-27  4:08 [PATCH 00/10] workqueue: async worker destruction and pool-binding synchronization Lai Jiangshan
2014-04-27  4:08 ` [PATCH 01/10] workqueue: use manager lock only to protect worker_idr Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-05 13:01   ` Tejun Heo
2014-05-06 15:43     ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-04-27  4:08 ` [PATCH 02/10] workqueue: destroy_worker() should destroy idle workers only Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-05 13:13   ` Tejun Heo
2014-05-06 15:58     ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-04-27  4:08 ` [PATCH 03/10] workqueue: async worker destruction Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-05 14:31   ` Tejun Heo
2014-05-05 15:02   ` Tejun Heo
2014-05-06 16:27     ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-06 16:31       ` Tejun Heo
2014-05-07  7:30   ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-07 13:15     ` Tejun Heo
2014-04-27  4:08 ` [PATCH 04/10] workqueue: destroy worker directly in the idle timeout handler Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-05 14:36   ` Tejun Heo
2014-05-07  7:10     ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-07 13:12       ` Tejun Heo
2014-05-07 13:38         ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-07 13:41           ` Tejun Heo
2014-05-07 15:30             ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-07 15:37               ` Tejun Heo
2014-04-27  4:09 ` [PATCH 05/10] workqueue: separate iteration role from worker_idr Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-05 14:57   ` Tejun Heo
2014-04-27  4:09 ` [PATCH 06/10] workqueue: convert worker_idr to worker_ida Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-05 14:59   ` Tejun Heo
2014-05-06 16:33     ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-06 16:35       ` Tejun Heo
2014-05-06 16:38         ` Tejun Heo
2014-04-27  4:09 ` [PATCH 07/10] workqueue: narrow the protection range of manager_mutex Lai Jiangshan
2014-04-27  4:09 ` [PATCH 08/10] workqueue: rename manager_mutex to bind_mutex Lai Jiangshan
2014-04-27  4:09 ` [PATCH 09/10] workqueue: separate pool-binding code out from create_worker() Lai Jiangshan
2014-04-27  4:09 ` [PATCH 10/10] workqueue: use generic pool-bind/unbind routine for rescuers Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-05 14:54   ` Tejun Heo
2014-05-05 15:05 ` [PATCH 00/10] workqueue: async worker destruction and pool-binding synchronization Tejun Heo
2014-05-12  6:56   ` [PATCH 00/10 V2] workqueue: async worker destruction and worker attaching/detaching Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-12  6:56     ` [PATCH 01/10 V2] workqueue: use manager lock only to protect worker_idr Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-12  6:56     ` [PATCH 02/10 V2] workqueue: destroy_worker() should destroy idle workers only Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-12 21:08       ` Tejun Heo
2014-05-13  6:08         ` Lai Jiangshan [this message]
2014-05-12  6:56     ` [PATCH 03/10 V2] workqueue: async worker destruction Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-12 21:20       ` Tejun Heo
2014-05-13  6:32         ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-13 14:14           ` Tejun Heo
2014-05-20  9:54             ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-12  6:56     ` [PATCH 04/10 V2] workqueue: destroy worker directly in the idle timeout handler Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-12 21:26       ` Tejun Heo
2014-05-12  6:56     ` [PATCH 05/10 V2] workqueue: separate iteration role from worker_idr Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-12 21:35       ` Tejun Heo
2014-05-12 21:37       ` Tejun Heo
2014-05-12  6:56     ` [PATCH 06/10 V2] workqueue: convert worker_idr to worker_ida Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-12 21:40       ` Tejun Heo
2014-05-13  6:43         ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-13 14:17           ` Tejun Heo
2014-05-12  6:56     ` [PATCH 07/10 V2] workqueue: narrow the protection range of manager_mutex Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-12  6:56     ` [PATCH 08/10 V2] workqueue: rename manager_mutex to attach_mutex Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-12 22:01       ` Tejun Heo
2014-05-13  6:45         ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-13 14:19           ` Tejun Heo
2014-05-12  6:56     ` [PATCH 09/10 V2] workqueue: separate pool-attaching code out from create_worker() Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-12  6:56     ` [PATCH 10/10 V2] workqueue: use generic attach/detach routine for rescuers Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-12 22:05       ` Tejun Heo
2014-05-13  6:55         ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-20  9:46     ` [PATCH V3 00/10] workqueue: async worker destruction and worker attaching/detaching Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-20  9:46       ` [PATCH V3 01/10] workqueue: use manager lock only to protect worker_idr Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-20  9:46       ` [PATCH V3 02/10] workqueue: destroy_worker() should destroy idle workers only Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-20  9:46       ` [PATCH V3 03/10] workqueue: async worker destruction Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-20 14:22         ` Tejun Heo
2014-05-20 14:23         ` Tejun Heo
2014-05-20 14:24         ` Tejun Heo
2014-05-20  9:46       ` [PATCH V3 04/10] workqueue: destroy worker directly in the idle timeout handler Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-20  9:46       ` [PATCH V3 05/10] workqueue: separate iteration role from worker_idr Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-20  9:46       ` [PATCH V3 06/10] workqueue: convert worker_idr to worker_ida Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-20  9:46       ` [PATCH V3 07/10] workqueue: narrow the protection range of manager_mutex Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-20  9:46       ` [PATCH V3 08/10] workqueue: rename manager_mutex to attach_mutex Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-20  9:46       ` [PATCH V3 09/10] workqueue: separate pool-attaching code out from create_worker() Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-20  9:46       ` [PATCH V3 10/10] workqueue: use generic attach/detach routine for rescuers Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-20 15:00       ` [PATCH V3 00/10] workqueue: async worker destruction and worker attaching/detaching Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5371B6CB.3090301@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --to=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox