From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754575AbaEMSvj (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 May 2014 14:51:39 -0400 Received: from mail-ee0-f43.google.com ([74.125.83.43]:61508 "EHLO mail-ee0-f43.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754475AbaEMSvX (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 May 2014 14:51:23 -0400 Message-ID: <53725CB9.4060903@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 19:56:09 +0200 From: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Zijlstra CC: mtk.manpages@gmail.com, Juri Lelli , Dario Faggioli , lkml , "linux-man@vger.kernel.org" , Linux API Subject: Re: [SCHED_DEADLINE man pages 0/2] Summary References: <53723235.40101@gmail.com> <20140513152719.GF2485@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net> In-Reply-To: <20140513152719.GF2485@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 05/13/2014 05:27 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 04:54:45PM +0200, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote: >> Peter, at al. >> >> The follow ups to this mail contain the changes to man-pages for >> the new sched_setattr() and sched_getattr() system calls, as well >> as the changes to the sched(7) man page to document the >> SCHED_DEADLINE policy, all new changes in kernel 3.14. >> >> I used the text you submitted, but _heavily_ edited it, and added >> a _lot_ of further details. Therefore, could you (and Juri, and >> Dario?) please carefully review the text. >> >> The follow-up mails are: >> >> [1/2] The sched_setattr.2 page that documents sched_setattr(2) >> and sched_getattr(2). >> >> [2/2] The revisions to the sched(7) page. >> >> In each case, I've posted the formatted output for easy reading, >> and attached the page source to the message. > > I've read (as careful as one still can after seeing too much of this) > both texts and they appear to be good. Thanks for checking, Peter. > Thanks for polishing, they are indeed clearer than what I provided. Good! Cheers, Michael -- Michael Kerrisk Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/ Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/