From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932859AbaEPNiY (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 May 2014 09:38:24 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:40561 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932737AbaEPNiV (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 May 2014 09:38:21 -0400 Message-ID: <537614CC.6020602@suse.de> Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 15:38:20 +0200 From: Hannes Reinecke User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Christoph Hellwig , James Bottomley CC: Stephen Rothwell , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: SCSI "staging" tree for linux-next? References: <20140515052645.GA26266@infradead.org> In-Reply-To: <20140515052645.GA26266@infradead.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 05/15/2014 07:26 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Hi James, > > we're past -rc5 and no SCSI patches have been collected for 3.16 yet, > despite a lot of patches including a lot of reviewed ones pending on the > list. > > I'd really love to get at least some testing for all the work that > sometimes has been pending for months in linux-next and would offer to > put together a tree of reviewed patches for linux-next. Is this fine > with you? > Seconded. Having a staging tree would make my life _so_ much easier. Cheers, Hannes -- Dr. Hannes Reinecke zSeries & Storage hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688 SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg GF: J. Hawn, J. Guild, F. Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)