From: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>
To: Rahul Sharma <rahul.sharma@samsung.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>,
Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@samsung.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 3/4] clk: samsung: Add driver to control CLKOUT line on Exynos SoCs
Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 16:58:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5376279C.4070006@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPdUM4O4RKFZFR_tcwG4pd7E6KMkneG9R_VbZPt+m4fGG_UFVg@mail.gmail.com>
On 16.05.2014 16:35, Rahul Sharma wrote:
> On 16 May 2014 16:22, Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com> wrote:
>> Hi Rahul,
>>
>> On 16.05.2014 12:39, Rahul Sharma wrote:
>>> [snip]
>>>> + gate->lock = &clkout_lock;
>>>> +
>>>> + mux->reg = reg + EXYNOS_PMU_DEBUG_REG;
>>>> + mux->mask = EXYNOS_CLKOUT_MUX_MASK;
>>>> + mux->shift = EXYNOS_CLKOUT_MUX_SHIFT;
>>>> + mux->lock = &clkout_lock;
>>>> +
>>>> + clk = clk_register_composite(NULL, "clkout", parent_names,
>>>> + parent_count, &mux->hw,
>>>> + &clk_mux_ops, NULL, NULL, &gate->hw,
>>>> + &clk_gate_ops, 0);
>>>> + if (IS_ERR(clk))
>>>> + goto err_unmap;
>>>> +
>>>
>>> Hi Tomasz,
>>>
>>> Do we really need a composite clock here? How about registering
>>> a mux and a gate separately?
>>
>> What's wrong with a composite clock? It simplifies the code as just a
>> single clock needs to be registered. I don't see any drawbacks compared
>> to registering two clocks separately.
>>
>
> I always took it as a thumb rule to not to use composite clocks if you
> can easily represent the block using basic clocks structures.
>
> There can be a problem when drivers using such clocks assume that such
> clock continue to offer composite functionality for all futures SoCs and
> write code around it. This is what we faced when fixing drivers during
> CCF migration.
The drivers using CLKOUT need to be designed this way, because they are
not Exynos-specific, such as drivers for HSIC hubs or audio codecs. They
can't have any Exynos-specific knowledge about clock hierarchy.
So regardless of whether this is implemented using the composite clock
or not, consumer device drivers need to be able to use just a single
clock to do whatever they need, e.g. gating or rate configuration.
However I can see one problem here with my implementation - it is
missing the CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT flag, so dividers of particular CLK_OUTs
from CMU blocks could be reconfigured.
Also the driver is missing save and restore of PMU_DEBUG register.
I will fix both in next version.
Best regards,
Tomasz
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-16 14:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-15 17:32 [PATCH RFC 0/4] Add support for Exynos clock output configuration Tomasz Figa
2014-05-15 17:32 ` [PATCH RFC 1/4] clk: samsung: exynos4: Add missing DMC clock hierarchy Tomasz Figa
2014-05-15 17:32 ` [PATCH RFC 2/4] clk: samsung: exynos4: Add CLKOUT " Tomasz Figa
2014-05-15 17:32 ` [PATCH RFC 3/4] clk: samsung: Add driver to control CLKOUT line on Exynos SoCs Tomasz Figa
2014-05-16 10:39 ` Rahul Sharma
2014-05-16 10:52 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-05-16 14:35 ` Rahul Sharma
2014-05-16 14:58 ` Tomasz Figa [this message]
2014-05-16 23:04 ` Mike Turquette
2014-05-19 7:16 ` Tushar Behera
2014-05-19 10:25 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-05-15 17:32 ` [PATCH RFC 4/4] ARM: dts: exynos: Update PMU node with CLKOUT related data Tomasz Figa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5376279C.4070006@samsung.com \
--to=t.figa@samsung.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mturquette@linaro.org \
--cc=pankaj.dubey@samsung.com \
--cc=rahul.sharma@samsung.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=tomasz.figa@gmail.com \
--cc=tushar.behera@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox