From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757909AbaEPRHt (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 May 2014 13:07:49 -0400 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:17852 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757884AbaEPRHs (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 May 2014 13:07:48 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,1068,1389772800"; d="scan'208";a="541694018" Message-ID: <537645D1.7020403@intel.com> Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 10:07:29 -0700 From: Dave Hansen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux390@de.ibm.com, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Martin Schwidefsky , Heiko Carstens , LKML Subject: gather_hugetbl_stats() doesn't use huge_pte...() variants Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Is the numa maps gather_hugetbl_stats() buggy on s390? It uses the normal pte_ variants.