From: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>
Cc: Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>,
<kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
J Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/13] CLK: TI: DRA7: make return of 0 explicit
Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 11:08:44 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5379BC0C.3070401@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140519074155.GO15585@mwanda>
On 05/19/2014 10:41 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> This one does feel like a bug in the original code as you mention. I
> have added the TI devs to the CC list so they can help us.
Yes this is a bug, the dra7_apll_enable() should return some sort of
error code if the lock fails. EBUSY maybe?
-Tero
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
>
> On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 06:31:05AM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
>> From: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>
>>
>> Delete unnecessary local variable whose value is always 0 and that hides
>> the fact that the result is always 0.
>>
>> Additionally dropped some unneeded braces in an affected if.
>>
>> A simplified version of the semantic patch that fixes this problem is as
>> follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
>>
>> // <smpl>
>> @r exists@
>> local idexpression ret;
>> expression e;
>> position p;
>> @@
>>
>> -ret = 0;
>> ... when != ret = e
>> return
>> - ret
>> + 0
>> ;
>> // </smpl>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>
>>
>> ---
>> Alternatively, is an error code wanted in either of the MAX_APLL_WAIT_TRIES
>> cases?
>>
>> drivers/clk/ti/apll.c | 13 +++++--------
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/ti/apll.c b/drivers/clk/ti/apll.c
>> index b986f61..659032a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/clk/ti/apll.c
>> +++ b/drivers/clk/ti/apll.c
>> @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@
>> static int dra7_apll_enable(struct clk_hw *hw)
>> {
>> struct clk_hw_omap *clk = to_clk_hw_omap(hw);
>> - int r = 0, i = 0;
>> + int i = 0;
>> struct dpll_data *ad;
>> const char *clk_name;
>> u8 state = 1;
>> @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ static int dra7_apll_enable(struct clk_hw *hw)
>> v = ti_clk_ll_ops->clk_readl(ad->idlest_reg);
>>
>> if ((v & ad->idlest_mask) == state)
>> - return r;
>> + return 0;
>>
>> v = ti_clk_ll_ops->clk_readl(ad->control_reg);
>> v &= ~ad->enable_mask;
>> @@ -74,17 +74,14 @@ static int dra7_apll_enable(struct clk_hw *hw)
>> udelay(1);
>> }
>>
>> - if (i == MAX_APLL_WAIT_TRIES) {
>> + if (i == MAX_APLL_WAIT_TRIES)
>> pr_warn("clock: %s failed transition to '%s'\n",
>> clk_name, (state) ? "locked" : "bypassed");
>> - } else {
>> + else
>> pr_debug("clock: %s transition to '%s' in %d loops\n",
>> clk_name, (state) ? "locked" : "bypassed", i);
>>
>> - r = 0;
>> - }
>> -
>> - return r;
>> + return 0;
>> }
>>
>> static void dra7_apll_disable(struct clk_hw *hw)
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-19 8:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-19 4:31 [PATCH 0/13] make return of 0 explicit Julia Lawall
2014-05-19 4:31 ` [PATCH 1/13] libertas: " Julia Lawall
2014-05-19 7:43 ` walter harms
2014-05-19 12:45 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2014-05-19 17:25 ` Dan Williams
2014-05-22 12:32 ` [PATCH] libertas: fix return value when processing invalid packet Dan Williams
2014-05-22 21:57 ` James Cameron
2014-05-20 0:30 ` [PATCH 1/13] libertas: make return of 0 explicit Julia Lawall
2014-05-20 0:36 ` Julia Lawall
2014-05-19 4:31 ` [PATCH 3/13] CLK: TI: DRA7: " Julia Lawall
2014-05-19 7:41 ` Dan Carpenter
2014-05-19 8:08 ` Tero Kristo [this message]
2014-05-19 11:25 ` [PATCH] CLK: TI: DRA7: return error code in failure case Julia Lawall
2014-05-19 12:23 ` Tero Kristo
2014-05-28 21:47 ` Mike Turquette
2014-06-19 11:24 ` Tero Kristo
2014-05-19 4:31 ` [PATCH 4/13] wimax/i2400m: make return of 0 explicit Julia Lawall
2014-05-19 7:47 ` walter harms
2014-05-19 11:30 ` Julia Lawall
2014-05-19 13:22 ` walter harms
2014-05-19 12:46 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2014-05-20 0:44 ` [PATCH 4/13 v2] " Julia Lawall
2014-05-21 21:19 ` David Miller
2014-05-19 4:31 ` [PATCH 5/13] usb: gadget: " Julia Lawall
2014-05-19 4:31 ` [PATCH 6/13] [NETFILTER]: arp_tables: " Julia Lawall
2014-05-19 4:31 ` [PATCH 7/13] staging: wlags49_h2: " Julia Lawall
2014-05-19 4:31 ` [PATCH 8/13] sound: mpu401.c: " Julia Lawall
2014-05-19 8:11 ` Takashi Iwai
2014-05-19 4:31 ` [PATCH 9/13] md: " Julia Lawall
2014-05-20 5:45 ` NeilBrown
2014-05-19 4:31 ` [PATCH 10/13] staging: rtl8192e: " Julia Lawall
2014-05-19 4:31 ` [PATCH 11/13] ufs: " Julia Lawall
2014-05-19 4:31 ` [PATCH 12/13] brcmsmac: " Julia Lawall
2014-05-19 4:31 ` [PATCH 13/13] s390/irq: " Julia Lawall
2014-05-19 6:03 ` Heiko Carstens
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5379BC0C.3070401@ti.com \
--to=t-kristo@ti.com \
--cc=Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=j-keerthy@ti.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mturquette@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox