From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754179AbaESKxF (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 May 2014 06:53:05 -0400 Received: from mail-ee0-f50.google.com ([74.125.83.50]:44824 "EHLO mail-ee0-f50.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752756AbaESKxC (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 May 2014 06:53:02 -0400 Message-ID: <5379E284.7030700@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 12:52:52 +0200 From: Tomasz Figa User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rickard Strandqvist , Ben Dooks , Kukjin Kim CC: Sangbeom Kim , Liam Girdwood , Mark Brown , Jaroslav Kysela , Takashi Iwai , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix for possible null pointer dereference in dma.c References: <1400191076-28279-1-git-send-email-rickard_strandqvist@spectrumdigital.se> In-Reply-To: <1400191076-28279-1-git-send-email-rickard_strandqvist@spectrumdigital.se> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Rickard, On 15.05.2014 23:57, Rickard Strandqvist wrote: > There is otherwise a risk of a possible null pointer dereference. > > Was largely found by using a static code analysis program called cppcheck. > > Signed-off-by: Rickard Strandqvist > --- > sound/soc/samsung/dma.c | 10 ++++++---- > 1 fil ändrad, 6 tillägg(+), 4 borttagningar(-) > > diff --git a/sound/soc/samsung/dma.c b/sound/soc/samsung/dma.c > index dc09b71..b1f6757 100644 > --- a/sound/soc/samsung/dma.c > +++ b/sound/soc/samsung/dma.c > @@ -115,17 +115,19 @@ static void dma_enqueue(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream) > static void audio_buffdone(void *data) > { > struct snd_pcm_substream *substream = data; > - struct runtime_data *prtd = substream->runtime->private_data; > + struct runtime_data *prtd = NULL; > > pr_debug("Entered %s\n", __func__); > > - if (prtd->state & ST_RUNNING) { > + if(substream) > + prtd = substream->runtime->private_data; > + > + if (prtd && prtd->state & ST_RUNNING) { > prtd->dma_pos += prtd->dma_period; > if (prtd->dma_pos >= prtd->dma_end) > prtd->dma_pos = prtd->dma_start; > > - if (substream) > - snd_pcm_period_elapsed(substream); > + snd_pcm_period_elapsed(substream); > > spin_lock(&prtd->lock); > if (!samsung_dma_has_circular()) { > Can you find a path (or use case, if possible) on which any of affected pointers will be NULL? Best regards, Tomasz