From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754883AbaESObX (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 May 2014 10:31:23 -0400 Received: from mail-pb0-f53.google.com ([209.85.160.53]:36966 "EHLO mail-pb0-f53.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750957AbaESObV (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 May 2014 10:31:21 -0400 Message-ID: <537A15B9.6000102@kernel.dk> Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 08:31:21 -0600 From: Jens Axboe User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Al Viro CC: Christoph Hellwig , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: time to move fs/bio.c to block/ ? References: <20140519141309.GB21570@infradead.org> <537A11CC.5060708@kernel.dk> <20140519142519.GI18016@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20140519142519.GI18016@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 05/19/2014 08:25 AM, Al Viro wrote: > On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 08:14:36AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: >> On 05/19/2014 08:13 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >>> I recently saw patches to fs/bio.c that were sent to Al instead of Jens. >>> I think having bio.c in fs/ is rather confusing, so maybe it's time to >>> include the simple git-mv for it in the your for-next tree? >> >> Sure, I've been thinking that too for a while. I'll do the move. > > While you are at it, could you take bio-integrity.c with it? _That_ > has zero excuse being anywhere in fs/* - not even "filesystem code > uses quite a few functions from that sucker" as with bio.c. > FWIW, consider the move ACKed. Yeah, I did include that in the move. -- Jens Axboe