From: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
To: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>,
Jim Keniston <jkenisto@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86: insn decoder: create artificial 3rd byte for 2-byte VEX
Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 16:38:58 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <537C5812.6070002@hitachi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <537A1C2F.7070005@redhat.com>
(2014/05/19 23:58), Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> On 05/17/2014 05:59 PM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>> (2014/05/17 3:34), Denys Vlasenko wrote:
>>> Before this patch, users need to do this to fetch vex.vvvv:
>>>
>>> if (insn->vex_prefix.nbytes == 2) {
>>> vex_vvvv = ((insn->vex_prefix.bytes[1] >> 3) & 0xf) ^ 0xf;
>>> }
>>> if (insn->vex_prefix.nbytes == 3) {
>>> vex_vvvv = ((insn->vex_prefix.bytes[2] >> 3) & 0xf) ^ 0xf;
>>> }
>>>
>>> Make it so that insn->vex_prefix.bytes[2] always contains vex.wvvvvLpp bits.
>>
>> I like this hack :)
>> If you don't mind, please add inline functions to get such vex bits from
>> struct insn too?
>
> I prefer to add such functionality when the first user surfaces:
> the needs of the user often dictate more suitable API.
OK, then this should be postponed until the actual user (uprobes)
appears.
> In this case (VEX insns), the API isn't that straightforward.
> For example, uprobe code narrowly escaped the need to detect maskmovq__
> (0f f7) and maskmovdqu (66 0f f7 or equivalent VEX) instructions.
>
> Let's assume we do need to detect them.
> Merely fetching and looking at vex.mmmmm, vex.pp and opcode doesn't
> really help that much in detecting these instructions:
> with such simplistic help, user needs to check both VEX and legacy forms.
>
> Perhaps a better API would be to form a word-sized "expanded opcode"
> for vector and VEX insns. Something along the lines of:
>
> [x.mmmmm.pp.opcode__]
>
> where x bit indicates XOP insn (as opposed to VEX), pp indicate
> none/66/F2/F3 prefixes, opcode__ is 8-bit opcode.
> then checking for maskmovFOO insns would be easier.
I see, but it also makes things complex just for special
instructions. I'd like to let decoder just decode it, not
elaborate.
Thank you,
--
Masami HIRAMATSU
Software Platform Research Dept. Linux Technology Research Center
Hitachi, Ltd., Yokohama Research Laboratory
E-mail: masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-21 7:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-16 18:34 [PATCH 1/2] x86: insn decoder: create artificial 3rd byte for 2-byte VEX Denys Vlasenko
2014-05-16 18:34 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86: extend insn decoder to understand xop and evex prefixes Denys Vlasenko
2014-05-17 16:00 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-05-19 15:04 ` Denys Vlasenko
2014-05-21 7:40 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-05-17 15:59 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86: insn decoder: create artificial 3rd byte for 2-byte VEX Masami Hiramatsu
2014-05-19 14:58 ` Denys Vlasenko
2014-05-21 7:38 ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=537C5812.6070002@hitachi.com \
--to=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
--cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
--cc=fche@redhat.com \
--cc=jkenisto@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox