From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
"rjw@rjwysocki.net" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
"linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org" <linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org>,
"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Arvind Chauhan <Arvind.Chauhan@arm.com>,
"inderpal.s@samsung.com" <inderpal.s@samsung.com>,
"nm@ti.com" <nm@ti.com>,
"chander.kashyap@linaro.org" <chander.kashyap@linaro.org>,
"pavel@ucw.cz" <pavel@ucw.cz>,
"len.brown@intel.com" <len.brown@intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>,
Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 3/7] driver/core: cpu: initialize opp table
Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 15:42:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <537CBB4C.7000006@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKohpo=-kmfH9Z+m8E9HQXs4AvRoUCDzcrns6-HHLH=AqeJ-DQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 21/05/14 15:01, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 21 May 2014 19:15, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> wrote:
>> [Nit] Not sure if we need this logging on each cpu, may be dev_dbg if you
>> still
>> fancy one ? :)
>
> It wouldn't happen on each CPU, but one CPU per policy as others
> would return -ENODEV.
>
Hmm agreed, but there are SoCs that support per CPU DVFS ;)
> I added dev_dbg earlier but then I thought dev_info is better as we may
> better show this to everybody as it about the most important device,
> i.e. CPU :)
>
>>> + /* Print error only if there is an issue with OPP table */
>>> + else if (error != -ENOSYS && error != -ENODEV)
>>> + dev_err(&cpu->dev, "%s: failed to init OPP table for
>>> cpu%d, err: %d\n",
>>> + __func__, cpu->dev.id, error);
>>> +}
>>> +#else
>>> +static inline void of_init_cpu_opp_table(struct cpu *cpu) {}
>>> +#endif
>>> +
>>
>>
>> IMO this could be more generic and applicable for any device if you replace
>> "struct cpu" with "struct device". I know this is currently used by cpu but
>> we can extend it's use for any device if needed in future. You can then move
>> this to pm_opp.h as of_init_dev_opp_table may be.
>
> Probably we will call of_init_opp_table() directly for other devices, as this
> function doesn't do anything else, apart from some prints.. So, probably
> leave is as is for now, unless a real need arises ?
>
I don't see anything cpu specific there, but that's just my opinion.
Regards,
Sudeep
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-21 14:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-21 11:09 [PATCH V2 0/7] CPUFreq: Initialize CPU's OPP tables from CPU core Viresh Kumar
2014-05-21 11:09 ` [PATCH V2 1/7] opp: remove -ENOSYS from dummy implementation of of_init_opp_table() Viresh Kumar
2014-05-21 13:16 ` Sudeep Holla
2014-05-21 13:27 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-05-21 11:10 ` [PATCH V2 2/7] opp: handle of_node_{get|put}() inside of_init_opp_table() Viresh Kumar
2014-05-21 11:10 ` [PATCH V2 3/7] driver/core: cpu: initialize opp table Viresh Kumar
2014-05-21 13:45 ` Sudeep Holla
2014-05-21 14:01 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-05-21 14:42 ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
2014-05-21 14:59 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-05-21 17:26 ` Sudeep Holla
2014-05-22 4:11 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-05-21 11:10 ` [PATCH V2 4/7] cpufreq: arm_big_little: don't " Viresh Kumar
2014-05-21 11:35 ` Inderpal Singh
2014-05-21 13:29 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-05-21 11:10 ` [PATCH V2 5/7] cpufreq: imx6q: " Viresh Kumar
2014-05-21 14:07 ` Sudeep Holla
2014-05-21 14:16 ` Shawn Guo
2014-05-21 14:31 ` Sudeep Holla
2014-05-21 11:10 ` [PATCH V2 6/7] cpufreq: cpufreq-cpu0: " Viresh Kumar
2014-05-21 11:10 ` [PATCH V2 7/7] cpufreq: exynos5440: " Viresh Kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=537CBB4C.7000006@arm.com \
--to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=Arvind.Chauhan@arm.com \
--cc=amit.daniel@samsung.com \
--cc=chander.kashyap@linaro.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=inderpal.s@samsung.com \
--cc=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nm@ti.com \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=shawn.guo@linaro.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox