From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
"rjw@rjwysocki.net" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
"linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org" <linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org>,
"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Arvind Chauhan <Arvind.Chauhan@arm.com>,
"inderpal.s@samsung.com" <inderpal.s@samsung.com>,
"nm@ti.com" <nm@ti.com>,
"chander.kashyap@linaro.org" <chander.kashyap@linaro.org>,
"pavel@ucw.cz" <pavel@ucw.cz>,
"len.brown@intel.com" <len.brown@intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>,
Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 3/7] driver/core: cpu: initialize opp table
Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 18:26:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <537CE1C4.9050008@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b59df199b373191791afcccd627d900ce07afa71.1400670427.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
On 21/05/14 12:10, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> All drivers expecting CPU's OPPs from device tree initialize OPP table using
> of_init_opp_table() and there is nothing driver specific in that. They all do it
> in the same way adding to code redundancy.
>
> It would be better if we can get rid of code redundancy by initializing CPU OPPs
> from core code for all CPUs that have a "operating-points" property defined in
> their node.
>
> This patch initializes OPPs as soon as CPU device is registered in
> register_cpu().
>
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> Cc: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com>
> Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
> Cc: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/base/cpu.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/cpu.c b/drivers/base/cpu.c
> index 006b1bc..853e99e 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/cpu.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/cpu.c
> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
> #include <linux/acpi.h>
> #include <linux/of.h>
> #include <linux/cpufeature.h>
> +#include <linux/pm_opp.h>
>
> #include "base.h"
>
> @@ -322,6 +323,25 @@ static int cpu_uevent(struct device *dev, struct kobj_uevent_env *env)
> }
> #endif
>
> +#if defined(CONFIG_PM_OPP) && defined(CONFIG_OF)
> +static inline void of_init_cpu_opp_table(struct cpu *cpu)
> +{
> + int error;
> +
> + /* Initialize CPU's OPP table */
> + error = of_init_opp_table(&cpu->dev);
> + if (!error)
> + dev_info(&cpu->dev, "%s: created OPP table for cpu: %d\n",
> + __func__, cpu->dev.id);
> + /* Print error only if there is an issue with OPP table */
> + else if (error != -ENOSYS && error != -ENODEV)
> + dev_err(&cpu->dev, "%s: failed to init OPP table for cpu%d, err: %d\n",
> + __func__, cpu->dev.id, error);
> +}
> +#else
> +static inline void of_init_cpu_opp_table(struct cpu *cpu) {}
Sorry I missed this earlier, main idea of this wrapper is not to have any
config dependency and hide error handling details for non-DT platforms. Since
of_init_opp_table has dummy implementation, you really don't need this dummy
implementation again here.
Regards,
Sudeep
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-21 17:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-21 11:09 [PATCH V2 0/7] CPUFreq: Initialize CPU's OPP tables from CPU core Viresh Kumar
2014-05-21 11:09 ` [PATCH V2 1/7] opp: remove -ENOSYS from dummy implementation of of_init_opp_table() Viresh Kumar
2014-05-21 13:16 ` Sudeep Holla
2014-05-21 13:27 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-05-21 11:10 ` [PATCH V2 2/7] opp: handle of_node_{get|put}() inside of_init_opp_table() Viresh Kumar
2014-05-21 11:10 ` [PATCH V2 3/7] driver/core: cpu: initialize opp table Viresh Kumar
2014-05-21 13:45 ` Sudeep Holla
2014-05-21 14:01 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-05-21 14:42 ` Sudeep Holla
2014-05-21 14:59 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-05-21 17:26 ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
2014-05-22 4:11 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-05-21 11:10 ` [PATCH V2 4/7] cpufreq: arm_big_little: don't " Viresh Kumar
2014-05-21 11:35 ` Inderpal Singh
2014-05-21 13:29 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-05-21 11:10 ` [PATCH V2 5/7] cpufreq: imx6q: " Viresh Kumar
2014-05-21 14:07 ` Sudeep Holla
2014-05-21 14:16 ` Shawn Guo
2014-05-21 14:31 ` Sudeep Holla
2014-05-21 11:10 ` [PATCH V2 6/7] cpufreq: cpufreq-cpu0: " Viresh Kumar
2014-05-21 11:10 ` [PATCH V2 7/7] cpufreq: exynos5440: " Viresh Kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=537CE1C4.9050008@arm.com \
--to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=Arvind.Chauhan@arm.com \
--cc=amit.daniel@samsung.com \
--cc=chander.kashyap@linaro.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=inderpal.s@samsung.com \
--cc=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nm@ti.com \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=shawn.guo@linaro.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox