From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753903AbaEUWOi (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 May 2014 18:14:38 -0400 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:42724 "EHLO mail.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753210AbaEUWOg (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 May 2014 18:14:36 -0400 Message-ID: <537D2522.80702@zytor.com> Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 15:13:54 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Borislav Petkov CC: Andy Lutomirski , Linus Torvalds , Jiri Kosina , Thomas Gleixner , Steven Rostedt , Andi Kleen , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Ingo Molnar , "Luck, Tony" Subject: Re: [RFC] x86_64: A real proposal for iret-less return to kernel References: <20140521163315.GJ21205@pd.tnic> <20140521214319.GF25130@pd.tnic> <537D1E8B.1010505@zytor.com> <20140521215411.GI25130@pd.tnic> <537D21F2.8030702@zytor.com> <20140521221121.GL25130@pd.tnic> In-Reply-To: <20140521221121.GL25130@pd.tnic> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 05/21/2014 03:11 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 03:00:18PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: >> So this is not a problem then. > > Yeah, f'get it - it is all good at that front. :-) > Seems like a comment would be in order, though. -hpa