From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751880AbaEVEBg (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 May 2014 00:01:36 -0400 Received: from e23smtp02.au.ibm.com ([202.81.31.144]:54693 "EHLO e23smtp02.au.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751095AbaEVEBf (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 May 2014 00:01:35 -0400 Message-ID: <537D762F.1080100@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 09:29:43 +0530 From: Anshuman Khandual User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Zijlstra CC: Ingo Molnar , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Michael Ellerman , Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: Fwd: [V6 00/11] perf: New conditional branch filter References: <1399280953-31442-1-git-send-email-khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <537C6DDE.9000204@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20140521092313.GF30445@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <537C827B.9090505@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20140521120146.GD2485@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net> In-Reply-To: <20140521120146.GD2485@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-MML: disable X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 14052204-5490-0000-0000-00000020330F Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 05/21/2014 05:31 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 04:09:55PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: >> On 05/21/2014 02:53 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: >>> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 02:41:58PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: >>>> Hello Peter/Ingo, >>>> >>>> Would you please consider reviewing the first four patches in this patch series >>>> which changes the generic perf kernel and perf tools code. Andi Kleen and Stephane >>>> Eranian have already reviewed these changes. The rest of the patch series is related >>>> to powerpc and being reviewed by Michael Ellerman/Ben. >>>> >>> >>> If they land in my inbox I might have a look. >>> >> >> Sent. > > Thanks, they look fine to me, although 1/x can use a lightly longer > changelog, making it explicit its a filter for conditional branches. > > How do people want this routed? Should I take all patches through tip, > or do I ask Ingo to create a special perf/cond branch which includes the > first 4 patches which can be merged into whatever ppc branch and the > rest then go on top in the ppc tree? > Peter, Thanks for considering the patchset.