From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964939AbaE2JI3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 May 2014 05:08:29 -0400 Received: from relay.parallels.com ([195.214.232.42]:38755 "EHLO relay.parallels.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933198AbaE2JI1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 May 2014 05:08:27 -0400 Message-ID: <5386F8EA.8050501@parallels.com> Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 13:07:54 +0400 From: Pavel Emelyanov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120605 Thunderbird/13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Vasily Kulikov CC: Richard Weinberger , , Serge Hallyn , , Oleg Nesterov , David Howells , "Eric W. Biederman" , Andrew Morton , Al Viro Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] /proc/pid/status: show all sets of pid according to ns References: <1401272683-1659-1-git-send-email-chenhanxiao@cn.fujitsu.com> <5385DA19.2060008@parallels.com> <20140528182824.GA5057@cachalot> <53863889.9080509@parallels.com> <20140529055954.GA10354@cachalot> In-Reply-To: <20140529055954.GA10354@cachalot> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.24.36.87] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 05/29/2014 09:59 AM, Vasily Kulikov wrote: > On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 23:27 +0400, Pavel Emelyanov wrote: >> On 05/28/2014 10:28 PM, Vasily Kulikov wrote: >>> On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 16:44 +0400, Pavel Emelyanov wrote: >>> It will be simplier >>> to parse the file -- if 'ns_ids' file contains some ID then this ID for >>> every ns can be obtained regardless of the specific ID name (SID, PID, >>> PGID, etc.). >> >> True, but given a task PID how to determine which pid namespaces it lives in >> to get the idea of how PIDs map to each other? Maybe we need some explicit >> API for converting (ID, NS1, NS2) into (ID)? > > AFAIU the idea of the patch is to add a new debugging information which > can be trivially obtained via 'cat /proc/...': I agree, but this ability will be very useful by checkpoint-restore project too and I'd really appreciate if the API we have for that would be scalable enough. Per-task proc file works for me, but how about sid-s and pgid-s? > ] We need a direct method of getting the pid inside containers. > ] If some issues occurred inside container guest, host user > ] could not know which process is in trouble just by guest pid: > ] the users of container guest only knew the pid inside containers. > ] This will bring obstacle for trouble shooting. > > A new syscall might complicate trouble shooting by admin. Pure syscall -- yes. What if we teach the ps and top utilities to show additional info? I think that would help. Thanks, Pavel