From: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
To: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>,
"Zhu, Lejun" <lejun.zhu@linux.intel.com>,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>,
"linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>, <bin.yang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] gpio: Add support for Intel SoC PMIC (Crystal Cove)
Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 19:03:23 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53875A4B.2060604@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140529150058.GB6263@lahna.fi.intel.com>
Hi All,
On 05/29/2014 06:00 PM, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 03:37:37PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> My idea is that you should call gpiochip_add() *first* and then
>> add the IRQs to the chip. In succession.
>>
>> Rationale: with dynamic GPIO numbers, gpio_to_irq()
>> cannot reasonably be working before the gpiochip is added,
>> so it should be added first, then the irqchip. Since irq_to_gpio()
>> is *NOT* to be used (rather obliterated), this is the sequence
>> we mandate.
>
> Thanks for the explanation. Makes sense.
>
Thanks a lot Linus for your comments here :)
Also, I'd like to note that GPIO IRQs can be accessible not only
when GPIO chips is added, but also when IRQ domain is registered
(at least it's valid for DT cases). In these cases gpiod_to_irq()
might be not used at all.
Regards,
-grygorii
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-29 15:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-23 2:00 [PATCH v4] gpio: Add support for Intel SoC PMIC (Crystal Cove) Zhu, Lejun
2014-05-27 5:38 ` Alexandre Courbot
2014-05-27 6:15 ` Alexandre Courbot
2014-05-27 6:22 ` Zhu, Lejun
2014-05-27 9:24 ` Grygorii Strashko
2014-05-27 8:46 ` Mika Westerberg
2014-05-27 12:04 ` Grygorii Strashko
2014-05-27 15:14 ` Mika Westerberg
2014-05-29 13:37 ` Linus Walleij
2014-05-29 15:00 ` Mika Westerberg
2014-05-29 16:03 ` Grygorii Strashko [this message]
2014-05-29 15:22 ` Linus Walleij
2014-05-30 8:25 ` Mika Westerberg
2014-06-03 8:10 ` Linus Walleij
2014-06-03 10:57 ` Mika Westerberg
2014-05-30 2:12 ` Zhu, Lejun
2014-06-03 8:08 ` Linus Walleij
2014-05-27 8:56 ` Zhu, Lejun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53875A4B.2060604@ti.com \
--to=grygorii.strashko@ti.com \
--cc=bin.yang@intel.com \
--cc=gnurou@gmail.com \
--cc=jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=lejun.zhu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).