From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934485AbaE3RQw (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 May 2014 13:16:52 -0400 Received: from mail-we0-f182.google.com ([74.125.82.182]:35937 "EHLO mail-we0-f182.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934081AbaE3RQt (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 May 2014 13:16:49 -0400 From: Jes Sorensen X-Google-Original-From: Jes Sorensen Message-ID: <5388BCFD.5070606@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 19:16:45 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paolo Bonzini , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , kvm-ia64@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, Gleb Natapov , Marcelo Tosatti Subject: Re: does anybody still care about kvm-ia64? References: <53888B65.40806@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <53888B65.40806@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 05/30/14 15:45, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > I was thinking of removing it in Linux 3.17. I'm not even sure it > compiles right now, hasn't seen any action in years, and all open-source > userspace code to use it has been dead for years. > > If you disagree, please speak up loudly in the next month. I'd say take it out back and show it mercy! Jes