From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753571AbaFBBCs (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Jun 2014 21:02:48 -0400 Received: from pindarots.xs4all.nl ([82.161.210.87]:48251 "EHLO pindarots.xs4all.nl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753481AbaFBBCr (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Jun 2014 21:02:47 -0400 Message-ID: <538BCD34.3020203@xs4all.nl> Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 03:02:44 +0200 From: Udo van den Heuvel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Francois Romieu CC: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: 3.14.1 network issue with rtl81xx chip References: <538B2502.5070707@xs4all.nl> <20140601174205.GA2027@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> In-Reply-To: <20140601174205.GA2027@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2014-06-01 19:42, Francois Romieu wrote: > Udo van den Heuvel : > [...] >> On two boxes with rtl network chip I see connections going down. > > Do you notice netdev watchdog messages in the kernel log ? I do not see messages that look like that. >> 3.14.1 has the issue. > > Does it qualify as a (recent ?) regression or is it a fresh new setup ? This machine has been running for over a year and some time ago the problem occurred. Same for the other problem machine which is even older. Udo