Re: [PATCH RFC 2/2] rcu: Add Josh Triplett as designated reviewer

[Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>]

On 06/02/2014 05:02 PM, josh@joshtriplett.org wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 01:38:56PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> On 06/02/2014 01:36 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2014-06-02 at 13:35 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>>>> On Mon,  2 Jun 2014 10:00:20 -0700 "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> --- a/MAINTAINERS
>>>>> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
>>>>> @@ -7321,6 +7321,7 @@ F:	kernel/rcu/torture.c
>>>>>  
>>>>>  RCUTORTURE TEST FRAMEWORK
>>>>>  M:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>>>> +R:	Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
>>>>>  L:	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>>>>>  S:	Supported
>>>>>  T:	git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulmck/linux-rcu.git
>>>>
>>>> I like the general principle - knowing who to poke regarding a kernel
>>>> change is useful.
>>>>
>>>> I don't care much whether it's "M:" or "R:", although "R:" carries more
>>>> meaning and hence is probably better.
>>>>
>>>> But why not "Cc:"?  That's meaningful too and is more copy-n-paste friendly.
>>
>> Josh, what are you assuming that Andrew and I did not?
> 
> Not sure what you mean here.  Responding to the text you quoted: I have
> no particular need to bikeshed the tag name, so if you prefer "Cc" and
> can convince get_maintainer.pl to handle it, fine by me.

Sorry, what I meant is that Andrew and I both mentioned copy-paste and
you replied earlier (and I have already deleted it) that copy-paste shouldn't
be necessary for someone who is using get_maintainer.pl.

Do you redirect its output to your patch file and then edit it or does
get_maintainer.pl work with git-send-email or something else?  if something
else, what is it, please?

thanks,
-- 
~Randy