public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch]blk-mq: blk_mq_tag_to_rq should handle flush request
Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2014 10:28:40 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <538F4938.7040309@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACVXFVOxx973ho9yN0W95YCj2XQBoYqyu4aD4bZ_9Pv89XGgnQ@mail.gmail.com>

On 06/04/2014 10:26 AM, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 12:09 AM, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> wrote:
>> On 06/04/2014 10:00 AM, Ming Lei wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 11:48 PM, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> wrote:
>>>> On 06/04/2014 09:43 AM, Ming Lei wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 11:31 PM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 09:02:19AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>>>>>>> scsi_mq_find_tag only gets the scsi host, which may have multiple
>>>>>>>> queues.  When called from scsi_find_tag we actually have a scsi device,
>>>>>>>> so that's not an issue, but when called from scsi_host_find_tag the
>>>>>>>> driver only provides the host.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Only solution I see right now is to have the flush_rq in the shared
>>>>>>> tags, but that would potentially be a regression for multiple
>>>>>>> devices and heavy flush uses cases. I'll see if I can come up with
>>>>>>> something better, or maybe Shaohua has an idea.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What about something like the following (untest, uncompiled, maybe
>>>>>> pseudo-code):
>>>>>>
>>>>>> struct request *blk_mq_tag_to_rq(struct blk_mq_tags *tags, unsigned int tag)
>>>>>> {
>>>>>>         struct request *rq = tags->rqs[tag];
>>>>>>
>>>>>>         if ((rq->cmd_flags & REQ_FLUSH_SEQ) && rq->q->flush_rq->tag == tag)
>>>>>>                 return rq->q->flush_rq;
>>>>>>         return rq;
>>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> Looks we thought it together, :-)
>>>>>
>>>>> Also maybe the flush_rq->tag need to be cleared in flush_end_io().
>>>>
>>>> It clears the command flag, so that should be enough.
>>>
>>> Only the flush_rq's command flag is cleared, and its parent request
>>> flag isn't cleared.
>>
>> Good point. Care to send in a patch? We can just clear it to -1U, at
>> least in blk-mq that's defined as an invalid tag.
> 
> Attachment patch should be enough.

Yep, looks fine. Care to send as a proper patch, then I will include it?

-- 
Jens Axboe


  reply	other threads:[~2014-06-04 16:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-05-09 12:07 [patch]blk-mq: blk_mq_tag_to_rq should handle flush request Shaohua Li
2014-05-09 15:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-05-10  4:00   ` Shaohua Li
2014-05-11 17:40     ` Jens Axboe
2014-05-30 14:09     ` Jens Axboe
2014-06-04 11:11       ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-06-04 14:15         ` Jens Axboe
2014-06-04 14:20           ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-06-04 14:54             ` Jens Axboe
2014-06-04 14:58               ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-06-04 15:02                 ` Jens Axboe
2014-06-04 15:05                   ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-06-04 15:08                     ` Jens Axboe
2014-06-04 15:10                       ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-06-04 15:11                         ` Jens Axboe
2014-06-04 15:16                           ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-06-04 15:19                             ` Jens Axboe
2014-06-04 15:22                       ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-06-04 15:28                         ` Jens Axboe
2014-06-04 15:31                   ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-06-04 15:39                     ` Jens Axboe
2014-06-04 15:47                       ` Jens Axboe
2014-06-04 16:25                         ` Jens Axboe
2014-06-05  1:27                           ` Shaohua Li
2014-06-05  2:05                             ` Jens Axboe
2014-06-05  2:27                               ` Shaohua Li
2014-06-05  2:40                                 ` Jens Axboe
2014-06-04 15:43                     ` Ming Lei
2014-06-04 15:48                       ` Jens Axboe
2014-06-04 16:00                         ` Ming Lei
2014-06-04 16:09                           ` Jens Axboe
2014-06-04 16:26                             ` Ming Lei
2014-06-04 16:28                               ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2014-06-04 16:33                                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-06-04 16:36                                   ` Ming Lei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=538F4938.7040309@kernel.dk \
    --to=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shli@kernel.org \
    --cc=tom.leiming@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox