From: Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@gmail.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>, Pranith Kumar <pranith@gatech.edu>
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com, davidlohr@hp.com, mingo@redhat.com,
xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] cleanup: use bool as return type for rwsem_is_locked
Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2014 21:41:21 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53926DC1.4050304@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53926406.4020200@gmail.com>
On 06/06/2014 08:59 PM, Pranith Kumar wrote:
> On 06/06/2014 08:18 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 02:11:18PM -0400, Pranith Kumar wrote:
>>> On 06/06/2014 01:53 PM, Pranith Kumar wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 3:35 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Now in general, I don't particularly like such superfluous changes, so
>>>>> unless you can show that GCC actually generates better code, I'd prefer
>>>>> to keep things as they are.
>>>>
>>>> Fixed and checked the assembly. It saves us 2 bytes of code, not much. I am not sure if that is worth it :(
>>>>
>>>> use bool as the return type for rwsem_is_locked() instead of int
>>>>
>
>>
>> If you are going to change the return type to bool, then you should
>> also remove the manual "!!" conversions to a boolean return and let
>> the compiler do it in the most optimal way.
>>
>
> Agreed, please find patch below:
>
Simplify the "!!" condition. This is much simpler. :)
change return type to bool to follow rwsem_is_locked()
Signed-off-by: Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@gmail.com>
---
fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c | 8 ++++----
fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h | 2 +-
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
index a6115fe..c02ac49 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
@@ -285,25 +285,25 @@ xfs_ilock_demote(
}
#if defined(DEBUG) || defined(XFS_WARN)
-int
+bool
xfs_isilocked(
xfs_inode_t *ip,
uint lock_flags)
{
if (lock_flags & (XFS_ILOCK_EXCL|XFS_ILOCK_SHARED)) {
if (!(lock_flags & XFS_ILOCK_SHARED))
- return !!ip->i_lock.mr_writer;
+ return (ip->i_lock.mr_writer != 0);
return rwsem_is_locked(&ip->i_lock.mr_lock);
}
if (lock_flags & (XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL|XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED)) {
if (!(lock_flags & XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED))
- return !!ip->i_iolock.mr_writer;
+ return (ip->i_iolock.mr_writer != 0);
return rwsem_is_locked(&ip->i_iolock.mr_lock);
}
ASSERT(0);
- return 0;
+ return false;
}
#endif
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h
index f72bffa..efebed6 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h
@@ -346,7 +346,7 @@ void xfs_ilock(xfs_inode_t *, uint);
int xfs_ilock_nowait(xfs_inode_t *, uint);
void xfs_iunlock(xfs_inode_t *, uint);
void xfs_ilock_demote(xfs_inode_t *, uint);
-int xfs_isilocked(xfs_inode_t *, uint);
+bool xfs_isilocked(xfs_inode_t *, uint);
uint xfs_ilock_data_map_shared(struct xfs_inode *);
uint xfs_ilock_attr_map_shared(struct xfs_inode *);
int xfs_ialloc(struct xfs_trans *, xfs_inode_t *, umode_t,
--
1.9.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-07 1:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-05 20:49 [RFC PATCH 1/1] cleanup: use bool as return type for rwsem_is_locked Pranith Kumar
2014-06-06 7:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-06 17:53 ` Pranith Kumar
2014-06-06 17:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-06 18:02 ` Pranith Kumar
2014-06-06 18:41 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-06-06 18:52 ` Pranith Kumar
2014-06-06 18:11 ` Pranith Kumar
2014-06-07 0:18 ` Dave Chinner
2014-06-07 0:59 ` Pranith Kumar
2014-06-07 1:41 ` Pranith Kumar [this message]
2014-06-07 2:39 ` Joe Perches
2014-06-07 23:44 ` Dave Chinner
2014-06-08 2:57 ` Pranith Kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53926DC1.4050304@gmail.com \
--to=bobby.prani@gmail.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=davidlohr@hp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pranith@gatech.edu \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox