public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@gmail.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>, Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Pranith Kumar <pranith@gatech.edu>,
	peterz@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com, davidlohr@hp.com, mingo@redhat.com,
	xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] cleanup: use bool as return type for rwsem_is_locked
Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2014 22:57:34 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5393D11E.2090906@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140607234411.GA9508@dastard>

On 06/07/2014 07:44 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 07:39:30PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
>> On Fri, 2014-06-06 at 21:41 -0400, Pranith Kumar wrote:
>>> On 06/06/2014 08:59 PM, Pranith Kumar wrote:
>>>> On 06/06/2014 08:18 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
>>>>> If you are going to change the return type to bool, then you should
>>>>> also remove the manual "!!" conversions to a boolean return and let
>>>>> the compiler do it in the most optimal way.
>> simpler still would be just removing the !! completely.
>> I presume in no case would it make an actual difference
>> in emitted code.
>>
>> ie:
>> 			return ip->i_lock.mr_writer;
> 
> Yup, that's exactly what I meant. Casting to a bool type does all
> the work of squashing all non-zero values to 1...
> 

change return type if xfs_isilocked() to bool to follow rwsem_is_locked()

Signed-off-by: Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@gmail.com>
---
 fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c | 8 ++++----
 fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
index a6115fe..c02ac49 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
@@ -285,25 +285,25 @@ xfs_ilock_demote(
 }
 
 #if defined(DEBUG) || defined(XFS_WARN)
-int
+bool
 xfs_isilocked(
 	xfs_inode_t		*ip,
 	uint			lock_flags)
 {
 	if (lock_flags & (XFS_ILOCK_EXCL|XFS_ILOCK_SHARED)) {
 		if (!(lock_flags & XFS_ILOCK_SHARED))
-			return !!ip->i_lock.mr_writer;
+			return ip->i_lock.mr_writer;
 		return rwsem_is_locked(&ip->i_lock.mr_lock);
 	}
 
 	if (lock_flags & (XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL|XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED)) {
 		if (!(lock_flags & XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED))
-			return !!ip->i_iolock.mr_writer;
+			return ip->i_iolock.mr_writer;
 		return rwsem_is_locked(&ip->i_iolock.mr_lock);
 	}
 
 	ASSERT(0);
-	return 0;
+	return false;
 }
 #endif
 
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h
index f72bffa..efebed6 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h
@@ -346,7 +346,7 @@ void		xfs_ilock(xfs_inode_t *, uint);
 int		xfs_ilock_nowait(xfs_inode_t *, uint);
 void		xfs_iunlock(xfs_inode_t *, uint);
 void		xfs_ilock_demote(xfs_inode_t *, uint);
-int		xfs_isilocked(xfs_inode_t *, uint);
+bool		xfs_isilocked(xfs_inode_t *, uint);
 uint		xfs_ilock_data_map_shared(struct xfs_inode *);
 uint		xfs_ilock_attr_map_shared(struct xfs_inode *);
 int		xfs_ialloc(struct xfs_trans *, xfs_inode_t *, umode_t,
-- 
1.9.1


      reply	other threads:[~2014-06-08  2:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-06-05 20:49 [RFC PATCH 1/1] cleanup: use bool as return type for rwsem_is_locked Pranith Kumar
2014-06-06  7:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-06 17:53 ` Pranith Kumar
2014-06-06 17:56   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-06 18:02     ` Pranith Kumar
2014-06-06 18:41     ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-06-06 18:52       ` Pranith Kumar
2014-06-06 18:11   ` Pranith Kumar
2014-06-07  0:18     ` Dave Chinner
2014-06-07  0:59       ` Pranith Kumar
2014-06-07  1:41         ` Pranith Kumar
2014-06-07  2:39           ` Joe Perches
2014-06-07 23:44             ` Dave Chinner
2014-06-08  2:57               ` Pranith Kumar [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5393D11E.2090906@gmail.com \
    --to=bobby.prani@gmail.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=davidlohr@hp.com \
    --cc=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=pranith@gatech.edu \
    --cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox