Re: [PATCH 6/7] lib/random32.c: Randomize timeout to the millisecond, not the second

Daniel Borkmann
2014-06-08T20:02:25Z

On 06/08/2014 02:42 PM, George Spelvin wrote:
>> Note, when you talk about efficiency here, this is called once every
>> 40+ secs ... ;)
>
> Agreed, in this case the code size saving (avoid a function call) is the
> main benefit. And I prefer to avoid inefficiency on general priinciples,
> if it's not serving some other goal.

Hm, don't think it will make much of a difference.