From: Dmitry Kasatkin <d.kasatkin@samsung.com>
To: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-security-module <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Josh Boyer <jwboyer@redhat.com>,
keyrings <keyrings@linux-nfs.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v5 1/4] KEYS: special dot prefixed keyring name bug fix
Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2014 11:17:08 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53956D84.5050100@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <539568B6.2070603@samsung.com>
On 09/06/14 10:56, Dmitry Kasatkin wrote:
> On 07/06/14 01:00, Mimi Zohar wrote:
>> On Sat, 2014-06-07 at 00:48 +0300, Dmitry Kasatkin wrote:
>>> On 3 June 2014 20:58, Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>>>> Dot prefixed keyring names are supposed to be reserved for the
>>>> kernel, but add_key() calls key_get_type_from_user(), which
>>>> incorrectly verifies the 'type' field, not the 'description' field.
>>>> This patch verifies the 'description' field isn't dot prefixed,
>>>> when creating a new keyring, and removes the dot prefix test in
>>>> key_get_type_from_user().
>>>>
>>>> Changelog v5:
>>>> - Only prevent userspace from creating a dot prefixed keyring, not
>>>> regular keys - Dmitry
>>>>
>>>> Reported-by: Dmitry Kasatkin <d.kasatkin@samsung.com>
>>>> Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> security/keys/keyctl.c | 6 ++++--
>>>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/security/keys/keyctl.c b/security/keys/keyctl.c
>>>> index cd5bd0c..62a9952 100644
>>>> --- a/security/keys/keyctl.c
>>>> +++ b/security/keys/keyctl.c
>>>> @@ -37,8 +37,6 @@ static int key_get_type_from_user(char *type,
>>>> return ret;
>>>> if (ret == 0 || ret >= len)
>>>> return -EINVAL;
>>>> - if (type[0] == '.')
>>>> - return -EPERM;
>>>> type[len - 1] = '\0';
>>>> return 0;
>>>> }
>>>> @@ -86,6 +84,10 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(add_key, const char __user *, _type,
>>>> if (!*description) {
>>>> kfree(description);
>>>> description = NULL;
>>>> + } else if ((description[0] == '.') &&
>>>> + (strncmp(type, "keyring", 7) == 0)) {
BTW. using strcmp is good enough here. string constants are always NULL
terminated.
Comparison will terminate after no more than 7 bytes.
>>>> + ret = -EPERM;
>>>> + goto error2;
>>>> }
>>>> }
>>> I think it does not another problem...
>>> It is not only prevent creating new keyring with ".abc" name but also
>>> prevent adding new key...
>>>
>>> this is wrong...
>> Seems to prevent creating a dot prefixed keyring, but permits creating a
>> dot prefixed key. Do you have an example?
> I think by mistake I was checking old patch in the thread because I have
> not noticed strncmp(type, "keyring", 7).
> This patch definitely should do the job.
>
> - Dmitry
>
>
>> thanks,
>>
>> Mimi
>>
>> Mimi
>>
>>
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-09 8:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 70+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-03 17:58 [RFC PATCH v5 0/4] ima: extending secure boot certificate chain of trust Mimi Zohar
2014-06-03 17:58 ` [RFC PATCH v5 1/4] KEYS: special dot prefixed keyring name bug fix Mimi Zohar
2014-06-06 21:48 ` Dmitry Kasatkin
2014-06-06 22:00 ` Mimi Zohar
2014-06-09 7:56 ` Dmitry Kasatkin
2014-06-09 8:17 ` Dmitry Kasatkin [this message]
2014-06-03 17:58 ` [RFC PATCH v5 2/4] KEYS: verify a certificate is signed by a 'trusted' key Mimi Zohar
2014-06-06 21:50 ` Dmitry Kasatkin
2014-06-09 13:13 ` Dmitry Kasatkin
2014-06-09 13:48 ` Mimi Zohar
2014-06-09 14:57 ` Dmitry Kasatkin
2014-06-03 17:58 ` [RFC PATCH v5 3/4] ima: define '.ima' as a builtin 'trusted' keyring Mimi Zohar
2014-06-06 21:53 ` Dmitry Kasatkin
2014-06-06 23:27 ` Mimi Zohar
2014-06-09 8:45 ` Dmitry Kasatkin
2014-06-03 17:58 ` [RFC PATCH v5 4/4] KEYS: define an owner trusted keyring Mimi Zohar
2014-06-09 12:13 ` Dmitry Kasatkin
2014-06-09 12:51 ` Mimi Zohar
2014-06-09 13:05 ` Dmitry Kasatkin
2014-06-09 13:48 ` Mimi Zohar
2014-06-09 13:58 ` Dmitry Kasatkin
2014-06-09 14:06 ` Dmitry Kasatkin
2014-06-09 16:33 ` Mimi Zohar
2014-06-10 8:48 ` [PATCH 0/4] KEYS: validate key trust with owner and builtin keys only Dmitry Kasatkin
2014-06-10 8:48 ` [PATCH 1/4] KEYS: define an owner trusted keyring Dmitry Kasatkin
2014-06-10 12:24 ` Josh Boyer
2014-06-10 12:41 ` Dmitry Kasatkin
2014-06-10 13:07 ` Mimi Zohar
2014-06-10 8:48 ` [PATCH 2/4] KEYS: fix couple of things Dmitry Kasatkin
2014-06-10 8:48 ` [PATCH 3/4] KEYS: validate key trust only with selected owner key Dmitry Kasatkin
2014-06-12 16:03 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-06-12 16:55 ` Mimi Zohar
2014-06-12 17:00 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-06-12 17:17 ` Mimi Zohar
2014-06-12 17:23 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-06-12 17:23 ` Dmitry Kasatkin
2014-06-12 17:32 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-06-12 17:37 ` Mimi Zohar
2014-06-12 18:36 ` Dmitry Kasatkin
2014-06-12 19:01 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-06-12 19:04 ` Dmitry Kasatkin
2014-06-12 19:05 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-06-12 19:15 ` Dmitry Kasatkin
2014-06-10 8:48 ` [PATCH 4/4] KEYS: validate key trust only with builtin keys Dmitry Kasatkin
2014-06-10 12:20 ` [PATCH 0/4] KEYS: validate key trust with owner and builtin keys only Josh Boyer
2014-06-10 12:52 ` Mimi Zohar
2014-06-10 13:21 ` Dmitry Kasatkin
2014-06-10 13:29 ` Josh Boyer
2014-06-10 14:53 ` Mimi Zohar
2014-06-10 12:58 ` Dmitry Kasatkin
2014-06-10 15:08 ` Matthew Garrett
2014-06-10 20:39 ` Dmitry Kasatkin
[not found] ` <CACE9dm9Ff6b3J=05QfcgBv-c_y=5qGNq1-ZSfo4smtj34i1e-A@mail.gmail.com>
2014-06-10 20:40 ` Matthew Garrett
2014-06-10 21:00 ` Dmitry Kasatkin
2014-06-10 21:17 ` Dmitry Kasatkin
2014-06-10 21:25 ` Matthew Garrett
2014-06-10 21:34 ` Dmitry Kasatkin
2014-06-10 21:40 ` Matthew Garrett
2014-06-10 21:45 ` Dmitry Kasatkin
2014-06-11 1:24 ` Mimi Zohar
2014-06-11 2:22 ` Matthew Garrett
2014-06-11 3:08 ` Mimi Zohar
2014-06-11 3:23 ` Matthew Garrett
2014-06-11 12:30 ` Mimi Zohar
2014-06-11 15:20 ` Matthew Garrett
2014-06-27 14:16 ` David Howells
2014-06-10 21:40 ` Dmitry Kasatkin
2014-06-10 12:45 ` Mimi Zohar
2014-06-10 12:49 ` Dmitry Kasatkin
2014-06-11 20:49 ` Mimi Zohar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53956D84.5050100@samsung.com \
--to=d.kasatkin@samsung.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com \
--cc=jwboyer@redhat.com \
--cc=keyrings@linux-nfs.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox