From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932066AbaFIVrH (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jun 2014 17:47:07 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:45058 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751388AbaFIVrE (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jun 2014 17:47:04 -0400 Message-ID: <53962B54.8030909@suse.cz> Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2014 23:47:00 +0200 From: Michal Marek User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Julia Lawall , Stephen Boyd CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mitchel Humpherys , Gilles Muller , Nicolas Palix , Grant Likely , Rob Herring , devicetree@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] coccinelle: Check for missing NULL terminators in of_device_id tables References: <1401213858-31950-1-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org> <538E09C1.30200@codeaurora.org> <538E119D.8010304@codeaurora.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Dne 3.6.2014 20:25, Julia Lawall napsal(a): > From: Stephen Boyd > > Failure to terminate an of_device_id table can lead to confusing > failures depending on where the compiler places the array. Add a > check to make sure these tables are terminated. Thanks to Mitchel > Humpherys for coming up with the pattern initially. > > Cc: Mitchel Humpherys > Cc: Julia Lawall > Cc: Gilles Muller > Cc: Nicolas Palix > Cc: Grant Likely > Cc: Rob Herring > Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org > Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd > Acked-by: Grant Likely > Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall > > --- > > v3: Removed unneeded rule bad_of_table. Placed * in context rule on the > closing brace; putting it on the field caused all fields to be marked. > > v4: corrected authorship > > scripts/coccinelle/misc/of_table.cocci | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 62 insertions(+) Applied to kbuild.git#misc, thanks. BTW, what is so special about of device drivers? Shouldn't we check for missing sentinels in all kinds of device tables? Thanks, Michal