Re: [patch V3 4/7] rtmutex: Siplify remove_waiter()

[Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>]

On 06/10/2014 08:53 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Mon, 09 Jun 2014 20:28:08 -0000
> Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
> 
>> Exit right away, when the removed waiter was not the top prioriy
>> waiter on the lock. Get rid of the extra indent level.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
>> ---
>>  kernel/locking/rtmutex.c |   26 ++++++++++----------------
>>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>>
>> Index: tip/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
>> ===================================================================
>> --- tip.orig/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
>> +++ tip/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
>> @@ -780,7 +780,7 @@ static void remove_waiter(struct rt_mute
>>  {
>>  	int first = (waiter == rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock));
>>  	struct task_struct *owner = rt_mutex_owner(lock);
>> -	struct rt_mutex *next_lock = NULL;
>> +	struct rt_mutex *next_lock;
>>  	unsigned long flags;
>>  
>>  	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&current->pi_lock, flags);
>> @@ -788,28 +788,22 @@ static void remove_waiter(struct rt_mute
>>  	current->pi_blocked_on = NULL;
>>  	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&current->pi_lock, flags);
>>  
> 
> Add comment here, something like...
> 
> 	/*
> 	 * Only update priority if this task was the highest priority
> 	 * task waiting on the lock, and there is an owner to update.
> 	 */
> 
> Rest looks good.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>

Reviewed-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>

Thanks,
Lai