Re: [PATCH 6/7] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Trivial code cleanup

[Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@semaphore.gr>]

On 10/06/2014 12:22 πμ, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-06-10 at 00:01 +0300, Stratos Karafotis wrote:
>> Remove unnecessary braces.
> 
> []
> 
>> @@ -204,20 +203,16 @@ static inline void intel_pstate_busy_pid_reset(struct cpudata *cpu)
> 
>>  static inline void intel_pstate_reset_all_pid(void)
>>  {
>>  	unsigned int cpu;
>> -	for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
>> +
>> +	for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
>>  		if (all_cpu_data[cpu])
>>  			intel_pstate_busy_pid_reset(all_cpu_data[cpu]);
>> -	}
> 
> It's pretty traditional to keep the braces here
> as it generally makes it clearer for the reader.
> 
> 	for (...) {
> 		if (foo)
> 			bar();
> 	}
> 
> is generally used over
> 
> 	for (...)
> 		if (foo)
> 			bar();
> 
> Just like using
> 
> 	if (foo) {
> 		/* commment */
> 		bar();
> 	}

OK, I will revert these changes in v2.

>> @@ -748,15 +744,14 @@ static int intel_pstate_init_cpu(unsigned int cpunum)
> []
>> -	pr_info("Intel pstate controlling: cpu %d\n", cpunum);
>> +	pr_info("Intel pstate controlling: CPU %d\n", cpunum);
> 
> cpu is very slightly preferred lower case.
> 
> $ git grep -E -i '^[^"]*"[^"]*\bcpu\b'|grep -w -i -o cpu | sort |uniq -c | sort -rn
>    2705 cpu
>    2084 CPU
>      17 Cpu
> 

Although, I believe that the term 'CPU' is more appropriate, I'll revert this
as the majority and Dirk prefer it. :)

Thanks for your comments!
Stratos