From: Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@semaphore.gr>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Dirk Brandewie <dirk.brandewie@gmail.com>
Cc: dirk.j.brandewie@intel.com,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Trivial code cleanup
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 23:14:53 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5397673D.8010200@semaphore.gr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5753346.hxK14sqO5y@vostro.rjw.lan>
On 10/06/2014 11:17 μμ, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, June 10, 2014 10:26:44 AM Dirk Brandewie wrote:
>> On 06/10/2014 08:31 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, June 10, 2014 08:12:48 AM Dirk Brandewie wrote:
>>>> On 06/09/2014 02:01 PM, Stratos Karafotis wrote:
>>>>> Remove unnecessary blank lines.
>>>>> Remove unnecessary parentheses.
>>>>> Remove unnecessary braces.
>>>>> Put the code in one line where possible.
>>>>> Add blank lines after variable declarations.
>>>>> Alignment to open parenthesis.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I don't have an issue with this patch in general but I would rather
>>>> the cleanup be done when there is a functional change in the given
>>>> hunk of code otherwise you are setting up a fence for stable/backporters
>>>> of functional changes in the future.
>>>
>>> I actually prefer separate cleanups so as to avoid doing multiple things
>>> in one patch.
>>>
>>> Rafael
>>>
>> I don't have strong feelings either way I was just trying to be kind
>> to the maintainers of distro kernels.
>
> And mixing fixes with cleanups in one patch doesn't do any good to them.
>
> Trust me, I used to work for a distro. :-)
>
So, should I proceed and split the patch or drop it? :)
Stratos
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-10 20:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-09 21:01 [PATCH 6/7] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Trivial code cleanup Stratos Karafotis
2014-06-09 21:22 ` Joe Perches
2014-06-10 14:43 ` Stratos Karafotis
2014-06-10 15:12 ` Dirk Brandewie
2014-06-10 15:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-06-10 17:26 ` Dirk Brandewie
2014-06-10 20:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-06-10 20:14 ` Stratos Karafotis [this message]
2014-06-10 20:43 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-06-10 21:02 ` Stratos Karafotis
2014-06-10 21:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-06-10 21:26 ` Joe Perches
2014-06-11 0:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-06-11 1:41 ` Joe Perches
2014-06-10 21:35 ` Stratos Karafotis
2014-06-11 0:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5397673D.8010200@semaphore.gr \
--to=stratosk@semaphore.gr \
--cc=dirk.brandewie@gmail.com \
--cc=dirk.j.brandewie@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox