From: Alin Dobre <alin.dobre@elastichosts.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: containers@lists.osdl.org, lxc-devel@lists.linuxcontainers.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Per-user namespace process accounting
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 15:37:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5399BB42.60304@elastichosts.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5386D58D.2080809@1h.com>
On 29/05/14 07:37, Marian Marinov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have the following proposition.
>
> Number of currently running processes is accounted at the root user namespace. The problem I'm facing is that multiple
> containers in different user namespaces share the process counters.
>
> So if containerX runs 100 with UID 99, containerY should have NPROC limit of above 100 in order to execute any
> processes with ist own UID 99.
>
> I know that some of you will tell me that I should not provision all of my containers with the same UID/GID maps, but
> this brings another problem.
If this matters, we also suffer from the same problem here. So we
support any implementation that would address it.
Cheers,
Alin.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-12 14:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-29 6:37 [RFC] Per-user namespace process accounting Marian Marinov
2014-05-29 10:06 ` Eric W. Biederman
2014-05-29 10:40 ` Marian Marinov
2014-05-29 15:32 ` Serge Hallyn
2014-06-03 17:01 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2014-06-03 17:26 ` Serge Hallyn
2014-06-03 17:39 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2014-06-03 17:47 ` Serge Hallyn
2014-06-03 18:18 ` Eric W. Biederman
2014-06-03 17:54 ` Eric W. Biederman
2014-06-03 21:39 ` Marian Marinov
2014-06-23 4:07 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2014-06-07 21:39 ` James Bottomley
2014-06-08 3:25 ` Eric W. Biederman
2014-06-12 14:37 ` Alin Dobre [this message]
2014-06-12 15:08 ` [lxc-devel] " Serge Hallyn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5399BB42.60304@elastichosts.com \
--to=alin.dobre@elastichosts.com \
--cc=containers@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lxc-devel@lists.linuxcontainers.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox