public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] spin_lock_*(): Always evaluate second argument
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 13:48:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <539ED993.80807@acm.org> (raw)

Evaluating a macro argument only if certain configuration options
have been selected is confusing and error-prone. Hence always
evaluate the second argument of spin_lock_nested() and
spin_lock_nest_lock().

This patch has the intentional side effect that it avoids that the
following warning is reported for netif_addr_lock_nested() when
building with CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC=n and with W=1:

include/linux/netdevice.h: In function 'netif_addr_lock_nested':
include/linux/netdevice.h:2865:6: warning: variable 'subclass' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
  int subclass = SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING;
      ^

Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
---
 include/linux/spinlock.h | 6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/spinlock.h b/include/linux/spinlock.h
index 3f2867f..32b16cc 100644
--- a/include/linux/spinlock.h
+++ b/include/linux/spinlock.h
@@ -197,8 +197,10 @@ static inline void do_raw_spin_unlock(raw_spinlock_t *lock) __releases(lock)
 		 _raw_spin_lock_nest_lock(lock, &(nest_lock)->dep_map);	\
 	 } while (0)
 #else
-# define raw_spin_lock_nested(lock, subclass)		_raw_spin_lock(lock)
-# define raw_spin_lock_nest_lock(lock, nest_lock)	_raw_spin_lock(lock)
+# define raw_spin_lock_nested(lock, subclass)		\
+	((void)(subclass), _raw_spin_lock(lock))
+# define raw_spin_lock_nest_lock(lock, nest_lock)	\
+	((void)(nest_lock), _raw_spin_lock(lock))
 #endif
 
 #if defined(CONFIG_SMP) || defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK)
-- 
1.8.4.5


             reply	other threads:[~2014-06-16 11:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-06-16 11:48 Bart Van Assche [this message]
2014-06-17  1:20 ` [PATCH] spin_lock_*(): Always evaluate second argument David Rientjes
2014-07-22  0:47 ` David Rientjes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=539ED993.80807@acm.org \
    --to=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox