From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Suppress -Wignored-qualifiers warnings
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 07:23:53 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <539EFDF9.8000708@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKfTPtBLSHYCdUpdN6MZiD_gCLa12Gv-hMO5oRY6uyiw4AqCug@mail.gmail.com>
On 06/16/2014 12:49 AM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> Hi Bart,
>
> Guenter sent similar patch few days ago
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/6/12/743
> with additional patches for ARM and powerpc architecture
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/6/13/399
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/6/13/407
>
Still not applied, though, so maybe a few more submissions
until one of them is accepted won't hurt ;-).
Guenter
> Vincent
>
>
> On 14 June 2014 11:36, Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> wrote:
>> Avoid that gcc reports the following warning when building with W=1:
>>
>> warning: type qualifiers ignored on function return type [-Wignored-qualifiers]
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
>> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
>> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
>> Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
>> ---
>> include/linux/sched.h | 8 ++++----
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
>> index 306f4f0..0376b05 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
>> @@ -872,21 +872,21 @@ enum cpu_idle_type {
>> #define SD_NUMA 0x4000 /* cross-node balancing */
>>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_SMT
>> -static inline const int cpu_smt_flags(void)
>> +static inline int cpu_smt_flags(void)
>> {
>> return SD_SHARE_CPUCAPACITY | SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES;
>> }
>> #endif
>>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_MC
>> -static inline const int cpu_core_flags(void)
>> +static inline int cpu_core_flags(void)
>> {
>> return SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES;
>> }
>> #endif
>>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
>> -static inline const int cpu_numa_flags(void)
>> +static inline int cpu_numa_flags(void)
>> {
>> return SD_NUMA;
>> }
>> @@ -999,7 +999,7 @@ void free_sched_domains(cpumask_var_t doms[], unsigned int ndoms);
>> bool cpus_share_cache(int this_cpu, int that_cpu);
>>
>> typedef const struct cpumask *(*sched_domain_mask_f)(int cpu);
>> -typedef const int (*sched_domain_flags_f)(void);
>> +typedef int (*sched_domain_flags_f)(void);
>>
>> #define SDTL_OVERLAP 0x01
>>
>> --
>> 1.8.4.5
>>
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-16 14:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-14 9:36 [PATCH] Suppress -Wignored-qualifiers warnings Bart Van Assche
2014-06-16 7:49 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-06-16 14:23 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=539EFDF9.8000708@roeck-us.net \
--to=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox