From: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>,
Michael Krufky <mkrufky@linuxtv.org>,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] media: dib9000: avoid out of bound access
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 03:41:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53A23FC4.5010302@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGXu5jKLoRkKuu8T=im6oEhn3WmXjZPwFXEbaPT6SeL29XrS0g@mail.gmail.com>
On 19.06.2014 01:50, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 3:02 PM, Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> wrote:
>> The current test to avoid out of bound access to mb[] is insufficient.
>> For len = 19 non-existent mb[10] will be accessed.
>>
>> A check in the for loop is insufficient to avoid out of bound access in
>> dib9000_mbx_send_attr.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
>> ---
>> drivers/media/dvb-frontends/dib9000.c | 5 ++++-
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/dib9000.c b/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/dib9000.c
>> index e540cfb..6a71917 100644
>> --- a/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/dib9000.c
>> +++ b/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/dib9000.c
>> @@ -1040,10 +1040,13 @@ static int dib9000_risc_apb_access_write(struct dib9000_state *state, u32 addres
>> if (address >= 1024 || !state->platform.risc.fw_is_running)
>> return -EINVAL;
>>
>> + if (len > 18)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> /* dprintk( "APB access thru wr fw %d %x", address, attribute); */
>>
>> mb[0] = (unsigned short)address;
>> - for (i = 0; i < len && i < 20; i += 2)
>> + for (i = 0; i < len; i += 2)
>> mb[1 + (i / 2)] = (b[i] << 8 | b[i + 1]);
>
> Good catch on the mb[] access! However, I think there is still more to
> fix since b[i + 1] can read past the end of b: Say b is defined as "u8
> b[3]". Passing len 3 means the second loop, with i==2 will access b[2]
> and b[3], the latter is out of range.
b[] and len are provided by the caller of dib9000_risc_apb_access_write.
dib9000_risc_apb_access_write cannot verify if the length of b[] matches
len at all.
Currently dib9000_risc_apb_access_write cannot handle odd values of len.
This holds even true if b[] has been padded with zero to an even length:
For odd values of len the last byte is not passed to dib9000_mbx_send_attr.
What is left unclear is how odd values of len should be handled correctly:
Should the caller provide a b[] padded with 0 to the next even number of
bytes,
or should dib9000_risc_apb_access_write take care not to read more then
len bytes,
or should odd values of len cause an error EINVAL.
From what I read in the coding one source of the value of len is
tuner_attach(), which is called from outside the dib9000 driver.
Heinrich
>
> -Kees
>
>>
>> dib9000_mbx_send_attr(state, OUT_MSG_BRIDGE_APB_W, mb, 1 + len / 2, attribute);
>> --
>> 2.0.0
>>
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-19 1:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-18 22:02 [PATCH 1/1] media: dib9000: avoid out of bound access Heinrich Schuchardt
2014-06-18 23:50 ` Kees Cook
2014-06-19 1:41 ` Heinrich Schuchardt [this message]
2014-06-19 2:26 ` Kees Cook
2014-06-19 14:49 ` [PATCH 1/1 v2] " Heinrich Schuchardt
2014-06-19 16:34 ` Kees Cook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53A23FC4.5010302@gmx.de \
--to=xypron.glpk@gmx.de \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.chehab@samsung.com \
--cc=mkrufky@linuxtv.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox