From: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Steve French <sfrench@samba.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Update wait_on_bit functions
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 13:45:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53A8214F.8050505@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140623004945.21714.26253.stgit@notabene.brown>
Hi,
On 23/06/14 01:52, NeilBrown wrote:
> These patches were in 'tip' for a while, but caused conflicts
> with other changes - both NFS and CIFS added new uses of
> wait_on_bit functions.
>
> So here they are again against 3.16-rc2. Hopefully no new users will
> be added before -rc3 or -rc4...
>
> (I hoped to submit this in the rc1 -> rc2 window, but that happened
> while I was on leave...)
>
> Thanks,
> NeilBrown
Acked-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
Steve.
> ---
>
> NeilBrown (2):
> SCHED: remove proliferation of wait_on_bit action functions.
> SCHED: allow wait_on_bit_action functions to support a timeout.
>
>
> Documentation/filesystems/caching/operations.txt | 2
> drivers/md/dm-bufio.c | 41 ++-----
> drivers/md/dm-snap.c | 10 --
> drivers/media/usb/dvb-usb-v2/dvb_usb_core.c | 12 --
> fs/btrfs/extent_io.c | 10 --
> fs/buffer.c | 11 --
> fs/cifs/connect.c | 10 --
> fs/cifs/file.c | 9 --
> fs/cifs/inode.c | 6 +
> fs/cifs/misc.c | 2
> fs/fs-writeback.c | 3 -
> fs/fscache/cookie.c | 7 +
> fs/fscache/internal.h | 2
> fs/fscache/main.c | 18 ---
> fs/fscache/page.c | 4 -
> fs/gfs2/glock.c | 25 ----
> fs/gfs2/lock_dlm.c | 8 -
> fs/gfs2/ops_fstype.c | 11 --
> fs/gfs2/recovery.c | 8 -
> fs/gfs2/super.c | 8 -
> fs/inode.c | 7 -
> fs/jbd2/transaction.c | 10 --
> fs/nfs/file.c | 4 -
> fs/nfs/filelayout/filelayoutdev.c | 4 -
> fs/nfs/inode.c | 6 +
> fs/nfs/internal.h | 2
> fs/nfs/nfs4state.c | 4 -
> fs/nfs/pagelist.c | 14 +-
> fs/nfs/pnfs.c | 2
> fs/nfs/write.c | 4 -
> include/linux/sunrpc/sched.h | 2
> include/linux/wait.h | 125 +++++++++++++++++++++-
> include/linux/writeback.h | 3 -
> kernel/ptrace.c | 8 -
> kernel/sched/wait.c | 30 ++++-
> mm/filemap.c | 20 +---
> mm/ksm.c | 8 -
> net/bluetooth/hci_core.c | 8 -
> net/sunrpc/sched.c | 4 -
> security/keys/gc.c | 11 --
> security/keys/request_key.c | 23 ----
> 41 files changed, 214 insertions(+), 292 deletions(-)
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-23 12:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-23 0:52 [PATCH 0/2] Update wait_on_bit functions NeilBrown
2014-06-23 0:52 ` [PATCH 1/2] SCHED: remove proliferation of wait_on_bit action functions NeilBrown
2014-06-23 7:51 ` David Howells
2014-06-23 0:52 ` [PATCH 2/2] SCHED: allow wait_on_bit_action functions to support a timeout NeilBrown
2014-06-23 12:45 ` Steven Whitehouse [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53A8214F.8050505@redhat.com \
--to=swhiteho@redhat.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sfrench@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox