Re: [PATCH 2/2] workqueue: stronger test in process_one_work()

[Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>]

On 06/20/2014 03:44 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 03:33:28PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
>> When POOL_DISASSOCIATED is cleared, the running worker's local CPU should
>> be the same as pool->cpu without any exception even during cpu-hotplug.
>>
>> This fix changes "(proposition_A && proposition_B && proposition_C)"
>> to "(proposition_B && proposition_C)", so if the old compound proposition
>> is true, the new one must be true too. so this fix will not hide any
>> possible bug which can be hit by old test.
>>
>> CC: Jason J. Herne <jjherne@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> CC: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
> 
> Applied to wq/for-3.17 with minor updates.
> 
> Nice set of cleanups.  Thanks!
> 

Hi,Tejun

I found the slight earlier 6 patches are in wq/for-3.17.
But these two patches (in this email thread) are not in wq/for-3.17 yet.

workqueue: clear POOL_DISASSOCIATED in rebind_workers()
workqueue: stronger test in process_one_work()

Thanks,
Lai