From: Oren Twaig <oren@scalemp.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Yoshihiro YUNOMAE <yoshihiro.yunomae.ez@hitachi.com>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>,
Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
HATAYAMA Daisuke <d.hatayama@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Shai Fultheim <shai@scalemp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, vsmp: Remove is_vsmp_box() from apic_is_clustered_box()
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 08:05:20 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53ACFB90.7030608@scalemp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53A7BC92.3080307@scalemp.com>
ping
On 06/23/2014 08:35 AM, Oren Twaig wrote:
> Remove invalid code which caused TSC to be declared as "unstable" on vSMP
> Foundation box even if it was stable and let the kernel decide for itself.
>
> When a vSMP Foundation box is detected, the function apic_cluster_num() counts
> the number of APIC clusters found. If more than one found, a multi board
> configuration is assumed, and TSC marked as unstable. This behavior is
> incorrect as vSMP Foundation may use processors from single node only, attached
> to memory of other nodes - and such node may have more than one APIC cluster
> (typically any recent intel box has more than single APIC_CLUSTERID(x)).
>
> To fix this, we simply remove the code which detects a vSMP Foundation box and
> affects apic_is_clusted_box() return value. This can be done because later the
> kernel checks by itself if the TSC is stable using the
> check_tsc_sync_[source|target]() functions and marks TSC as unstable if needed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oren Twaig <oren@scalemp.com>
> Acked-by: Shai Fultheim <shai@scalemp.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h | 8 ------
> arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c | 60 +------------------------------------------
> 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 67 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h
> index 19b0eba..c100694 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h
> @@ -85,14 +85,6 @@ static inline bool apic_from_smp_config(void)
> #include <asm/paravirt.h>
> #endif
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> -extern int is_vsmp_box(void);
> -#else
> -static inline int is_vsmp_box(void)
> -{
> - return 0;
> -}
> -#endif
> extern int setup_profiling_timer(unsigned int);
>
> static inline void native_apic_mem_write(u32 reg, u32 v)
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c
> index ad28db7..2b85bb9 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c
> @@ -2451,51 +2451,6 @@ static void apic_pm_activate(void) { }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
>
> -static int apic_cluster_num(void)
> -{
> - int i, clusters, zeros;
> - unsigned id;
> - u16 *bios_cpu_apicid;
> - DECLARE_BITMAP(clustermap, NUM_APIC_CLUSTERS);
> -
> - bios_cpu_apicid = early_per_cpu_ptr(x86_bios_cpu_apicid);
> - bitmap_zero(clustermap, NUM_APIC_CLUSTERS);
> -
> - for (i = 0; i < nr_cpu_ids; i++) {
> - /* are we being called early in kernel startup? */
> - if (bios_cpu_apicid) {
> - id = bios_cpu_apicid[i];
> - } else if (i < nr_cpu_ids) {
> - if (cpu_present(i))
> - id = per_cpu(x86_bios_cpu_apicid, i);
> - else
> - continue;
> - } else
> - break;
> -
> - if (id != BAD_APICID)
> - __set_bit(APIC_CLUSTERID(id), clustermap);
> - }
> -
> - /* Problem: Partially populated chassis may not have CPUs in some of
> - * the APIC clusters they have been allocated. Only present CPUs have
> - * x86_bios_cpu_apicid entries, thus causing zeroes in the bitmap.
> - * Since clusters are allocated sequentially, count zeros only if
> - * they are bounded by ones.
> - */
> - clusters = 0;
> - zeros = 0;
> - for (i = 0; i < NUM_APIC_CLUSTERS; i++) {
> - if (test_bit(i, clustermap)) {
> - clusters += 1 + zeros;
> - zeros = 0;
> - } else
> - ++zeros;
> - }
> -
> - return clusters;
> -}
> -
> static int multi_checked;
> static int multi;
>
> @@ -2540,20 +2495,7 @@ static void dmi_check_multi(void)
> int apic_is_clustered_box(void)
> {
> dmi_check_multi();
> - if (multi)
> - return 1;
> -
> - if (!is_vsmp_box())
> - return 0;
> -
> - /*
> - * ScaleMP vSMPowered boxes have one cluster per board and TSCs are
> - * not guaranteed to be synced between boards
> - */
> - if (apic_cluster_num() > 1)
> - return 1;
> -
> - return 0;
> + return multi;
> }
> #endif
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-27 5:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-23 5:35 [PATCH] x86, vsmp: Remove is_vsmp_box() from apic_is_clustered_box() Oren Twaig
2014-06-23 14:18 ` Andi Kleen
2014-06-27 5:05 ` Oren Twaig [this message]
2014-06-27 5:39 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-06-29 10:07 ` Oren Twaig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53ACFB90.7030608@scalemp.com \
--to=oren@scalemp.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=d.hatayama@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=shai@scalemp.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yoshihiro.yunomae.ez@hitachi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox