From: Keerthy <a0393675@ti.com>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Cc: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>, <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
<lgirdwood@gmail.com>, <broonie@kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 8/9] regulator: palmas: add driver data and modularize the probe
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 15:06:58 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53AD3B3A.2030401@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140627082351.GE19645@lee--X1>
Hi Lee Jones,
On Friday 27 June 2014 01:53 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jun 2014, Keerthy wrote:
>> add driver data and modularize the probe.
> Nit: This is a sentence, it should start with a capital letter.
The series is already pulled by Mark. I Can send fixes on top of
that patch set.
>> Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
>> ---
>>
>> Changes in V2:
>>
>> * Fixed the order of variable declarations.
>>
>> drivers/mfd/palmas.c | 44 +--
>> drivers/regulator/palmas-regulator.c | 658 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>> 2 files changed, 396 insertions(+), 306 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/palmas.c b/drivers/mfd/palmas.c
>> index c12759d..28cb048 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mfd/palmas.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mfd/palmas.c
>> @@ -25,42 +25,6 @@
>> #include <linux/mfd/palmas.h>
>> #include <linux/of_device.h>
>>
>> -#define EXTERNAL_REQUESTOR(_id, _offset, _pos) \
>> - [PALMAS_EXTERNAL_REQSTR_ID_##_id] = { \
>> - .id = PALMAS_EXTERNAL_REQSTR_ID_##_id, \
>> - .reg_offset = _offset, \
>> - .bit_pos = _pos, \
>> - }
>> -
>> -static struct palmas_sleep_requestor_info sleep_req_info[] = {
>> - EXTERNAL_REQUESTOR(REGEN1, 0, 0),
>> - EXTERNAL_REQUESTOR(REGEN2, 0, 1),
>> - EXTERNAL_REQUESTOR(SYSEN1, 0, 2),
>> - EXTERNAL_REQUESTOR(SYSEN2, 0, 3),
>> - EXTERNAL_REQUESTOR(CLK32KG, 0, 4),
>> - EXTERNAL_REQUESTOR(CLK32KGAUDIO, 0, 5),
>> - EXTERNAL_REQUESTOR(REGEN3, 0, 6),
>> - EXTERNAL_REQUESTOR(SMPS12, 1, 0),
>> - EXTERNAL_REQUESTOR(SMPS3, 1, 1),
>> - EXTERNAL_REQUESTOR(SMPS45, 1, 2),
>> - EXTERNAL_REQUESTOR(SMPS6, 1, 3),
>> - EXTERNAL_REQUESTOR(SMPS7, 1, 4),
>> - EXTERNAL_REQUESTOR(SMPS8, 1, 5),
>> - EXTERNAL_REQUESTOR(SMPS9, 1, 6),
>> - EXTERNAL_REQUESTOR(SMPS10, 1, 7),
>> - EXTERNAL_REQUESTOR(LDO1, 2, 0),
>> - EXTERNAL_REQUESTOR(LDO2, 2, 1),
>> - EXTERNAL_REQUESTOR(LDO3, 2, 2),
>> - EXTERNAL_REQUESTOR(LDO4, 2, 3),
>> - EXTERNAL_REQUESTOR(LDO5, 2, 4),
>> - EXTERNAL_REQUESTOR(LDO6, 2, 5),
>> - EXTERNAL_REQUESTOR(LDO7, 2, 6),
>> - EXTERNAL_REQUESTOR(LDO8, 2, 7),
>> - EXTERNAL_REQUESTOR(LDO9, 3, 0),
>> - EXTERNAL_REQUESTOR(LDOLN, 3, 1),
>> - EXTERNAL_REQUESTOR(LDOUSB, 3, 2),
>> -};
>> -
> Happy with this, good riddance.
>
>> static const struct regmap_config palmas_regmap_config[PALMAS_NUM_CLIENTS] = {
>> {
>> .reg_bits = 8,
>> @@ -365,10 +329,10 @@ static struct regmap_irq_chip tps65917_irq_chip = {
>> int palmas_ext_control_req_config(struct palmas *palmas,
>> enum palmas_external_requestor_id id, int ext_ctrl, bool enable)
>> {
>> + struct palmas_pmic_driver_data *pmic_ddata = palmas->pmic_ddata;
>> int preq_mask_bit = 0;
>> int reg_add = 0;
>> - int bit_pos;
>> - int ret;
>> + int bit_pos, ret;
> I don't like this change.
>
> [...]
>
Regards,
Keerthy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-27 9:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-18 9:58 [PATCH v2 0/9] mfd: tps65917: Add support for for TPS65917 PMIC Keerthy
2014-06-18 9:58 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] mfd: Add DT bindings for tps65917 PMIC Keerthy
2014-06-18 9:58 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] regulator: palmas: Add tps65917 compatible string Keerthy
2014-06-18 9:58 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] mfd: palmas: Add tps65917 specific definitions and enums Keerthy
2014-06-18 9:58 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] mfd: palmas: Add tps65917 support Keerthy
2014-06-18 9:58 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] regulator: palmas: Shift the reg_info structure definition to the header file Keerthy
2014-06-18 9:58 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] mfd: palmas: shift the palmas_sleep_requestor_info " Keerthy
2014-06-18 9:58 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] regulator: palmas: Add palmas_pmic_driver_data structure Keerthy
2014-06-27 8:20 ` Lee Jones
2014-06-18 9:58 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] regulator: palmas: add driver data and modularize the probe Keerthy
2014-06-27 8:23 ` Lee Jones
2014-06-27 9:36 ` Keerthy [this message]
2014-06-18 9:59 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] regulator: palmas: Add tps65917 PMIC support Keerthy
2014-06-23 11:32 ` [PATCH v2 0/9] mfd: tps65917: Add support for for TPS65917 PMIC Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53AD3B3A.2030401@ti.com \
--to=a0393675@ti.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=j-keerthy@ti.com \
--cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox