From: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
x86-ml <x86@kernel.org>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] 2 RAS fixes for 3.17, refreshed
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 12:59:56 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53ADA30C.7090908@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140627160841.GH23153@pd.tnic>
On 06/27/2014 12:08 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 11:12:59AM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>> Yes, it fails because xen_late_init_mcelog() registers /dev/mcelog and (I
>> think) it happens before mcheck_init_device().
> Yes, mcheck_init_device is device_initcall_sync() while
> xen_late_init_mcelog() is device_initcall().
>
>> In other words, misc_register() expected to fail in mcheck/mce.c on
>> (privileged?) PV guests (provided right CONFIG_XEN_* is set).
> So
>
> cef12ee52b05 ("xen/mce: Add mcelog support for Xen platform")
>
> made it this way so that xen's init routine runs first.
>
> So it is not the case that misc_register() fails often on xen but it is
> *supposed* to fail by design, when running in dom0. And *then* you need
> the notifier *not* unregistered on the error path so that the timers do
> get deleted properly.
>
> Ok, I see it now. Frankly, I'm not really sure I want to rush this in
> now because it might break something else, Who TF knows what.
>
> Right now my gut feeling tells me we should still queue it for 3.17 and
> have it run for a while in linux-next. We can backport it to stable
> later after some testing...
I don't have a problem with having it soak in linux-next for a while but
I am not too crazy about releasing 3.16 with this bug (even knowing that
there will be a backport later). When we hit this problem the results
are rather unpleasant in that it's not immediately clear what's happened.
We are still at rc2 so we have 3-4 weeks before 3.16 goes out.
-boris
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-27 16:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-22 16:46 [GIT PULL] RAS fix for 3.17 Borislav Petkov
2014-06-24 13:24 ` [GIT PULL] 2 RAS fixes for 3.17, refreshed Borislav Petkov
2014-06-24 13:27 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-27 15:01 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-06-27 15:12 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-06-27 16:08 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-06-27 16:59 ` Boris Ostrovsky [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53ADA30C.7090908@oracle.com \
--to=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox