From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754351AbaGAVAk (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Jul 2014 17:00:40 -0400 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:7357 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751744AbaGAVAj (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Jul 2014 17:00:39 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.01,584,1400050800"; d="scan'208";a="537386066" Message-ID: <53B32170.1040707@intel.com> Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2014 14:00:32 -0700 From: Dave Hansen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Naoya Horiguchi , linux-mm@kvack.org CC: Andrew Morton , Hugh Dickins , "Kirill A. Shutemov" , Jerome Marchand , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Naoya Horiguchi , Jet Chen Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 11/13] mempolicy: apply page table walker on queue_pages_range() References: <1404234451-21695-1-git-send-email-n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com> <1404234451-21695-12-git-send-email-n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com> In-Reply-To: <1404234451-21695-12-git-send-email-n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 07/01/2014 10:07 AM, Naoya Horiguchi wrote: > queue_pages_range() does page table walking in its own way now, but there > is some code duplicate. This patch applies page table walker to reduce > lines of code. > > queue_pages_range() has to do some precheck to determine whether we really > walk over the vma or just skip it. Now we have test_walk() callback in > mm_walk for this purpose, so we can do this replacement cleanly. > queue_pages_test_walk() depends on not only the current vma but also the > previous one, so queue_pages->prev is introduced to remember it. Hi Naoya, The previous version of this patch caused a performance regression which was reported to you: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=140375975525069&w=2 Has that been dealt with in this version somehow?