From: "Yang,Wei" <Wei.Yang@windriver.com>
To: <Wei.Yang@windriver.com>, <mroberto@cpti.cetuc.puc-rio.br>,
<rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] ARM:sa1100: Remove a redundant spin lock
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2014 17:19:40 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53B3CEAC.9080609@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1404200488-7809-1-git-send-email-Wei.Yang@windriver.com>
Hi Guys,
What about this patch?
Thanks
Wei
On 07/01/2014 03:41 PM, Wei.Yang@windriver.com wrote:
> From: Yang Wei <Wei.Yang@windriver.com>
>
> The pair read/write of accessing pci confiuration space function
> has already protected by pci_lock. so remove nano_lock.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yang Wei <Wei.Yang@windriver.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-sa1100/pci-nanoengine.c | 9 ---------
> 1 file changed, 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/pci-nanoengine.c b/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/pci-nanoengine.c
> index ff02e2d..b944c99 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/pci-nanoengine.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/pci-nanoengine.c
> @@ -30,7 +30,6 @@
> #include <mach/nanoengine.h>
> #include <mach/hardware.h>
>
> -static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(nano_lock);
>
> static int nanoengine_get_pci_address(struct pci_bus *bus,
> unsigned int devfn, int where, unsigned long *address)
> @@ -52,7 +51,6 @@ static int nanoengine_read_config(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned int devfn, int w
> {
> int ret;
> unsigned long address;
> - unsigned long flags;
> u32 v;
>
> /* nanoEngine PCI bridge does not return -1 for a non-existing
> @@ -64,15 +62,12 @@ static int nanoengine_read_config(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned int devfn, int w
> goto exit_function;
> }
>
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&nano_lock, flags);
>
> ret = nanoengine_get_pci_address(bus, devfn, where, &address);
> if (ret != PCIBIOS_SUCCESSFUL)
> return ret;
> v = __raw_readl(address);
>
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&nano_lock, flags);
> -
> v >>= ((where & 3) * 8);
> v &= (unsigned long)(-1) >> ((4 - size) * 8);
>
> @@ -86,13 +81,11 @@ static int nanoengine_write_config(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned int devfn, int
> {
> int ret;
> unsigned long address;
> - unsigned long flags;
> unsigned shift;
> u32 v;
>
> shift = (where & 3) * 8;
>
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&nano_lock, flags);
>
> ret = nanoengine_get_pci_address(bus, devfn, where, &address);
> if (ret != PCIBIOS_SUCCESSFUL)
> @@ -113,8 +106,6 @@ static int nanoengine_write_config(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned int devfn, int
> }
> __raw_writel(v, address);
>
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&nano_lock, flags);
> -
> return PCIBIOS_SUCCESSFUL;
> }
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-02 9:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-01 7:41 [PATCH v1] ARM:sa1100: Remove a redundant spin lock Wei.Yang
2014-07-02 9:19 ` Yang,Wei [this message]
2014-07-02 10:19 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-07-02 11:02 ` Yang,Wei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53B3CEAC.9080609@windriver.com \
--to=wei.yang@windriver.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mroberto@cpti.cetuc.puc-rio.br \
--cc=rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox