From: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
To: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>,
Terje Bergstrom <tbergstrom@nvidia.com>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>,
"linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org"
<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] drm/dsi: Add flag for continuous clock behavior
Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2014 11:53:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53B679A0.1060306@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAVeFu+sTWhwCTd9ntqdJQA1aaFV93zHnyRSj6WA-8VicFuvgQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 07/04/2014 07:57 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> Hi Andrejz,
>
> On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 5:23 PM, Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com> wrote:
>> Hi Alexandre,
>>
>> Thanks for the patch.
>>
>> On 07/02/2014 02:19 PM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
>>> As per section 5.6.1 of the DSI specification, all DSI transmitters must
>>> support continuous clock behavior on the clock lane, while non-continuous
>>> mode support is only optional. Add a flag that allows devices to indicate
>>> that they require continuous clock mode to operate properly.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
>>> ---
>>> include/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h | 2 ++
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h b/include/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h
>>> index 944f33f..5913ef4 100644
>>> --- a/include/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h
>>> +++ b/include/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h
>>> @@ -94,6 +94,8 @@ void mipi_dsi_host_unregister(struct mipi_dsi_host *host);
>>> #define MIPI_DSI_MODE_VSYNC_FLUSH BIT(8)
>>> /* disable EoT packets in HS mode */
>>> #define MIPI_DSI_MODE_EOT_PACKET BIT(9)
>>> +/* use continuous clock behavior on the clock lane */
>>> +#define MIPI_DSI_MODE_CLOCK_CONTINUOUS BIT(10)
>>>
>> According to MIPI DSI specification "All DSI transmitters and receivers
>> shall support continuous clock behavior on the Clock Lane, and
>> optionally may support non-continuous clock behavior". It suggests that
>> continuous clock should be default behavior. So maybe better is to
>> introduce sth like:
>> +#define MIPI_DSI_MODE_CLOCK_NON_CONTINUOUS BIT(10)
> I started under the assumption that current host drivers assumed
> non-continuous clock (as the Tegra driver currently does).
Exynos DSI driver uses continuous clock.
Currently, in mainline, there are no more dsi hosts using drm_mipi_dsi.h.
As I stated before I prefer to follow dsi specification and it states
clearly that
continuous behavior is required, non-continouous is optional.
Moreover for tegra chip continuous behavior is also the default one.
Regards
Andrzej
> In that
> light, it seemed to make sense (and to be less intrusive) to introduce
> that flag as a restriction rather than a capability. But if you think
> this should be a capability I am not strongly against it - either way,
> host drivers need to be changed to take that flag into account.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-04 9:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-02 12:19 [PATCH 0/4] drm/dsi/tegra: continuous clock support Alexandre Courbot
2014-07-02 12:19 ` [PATCH 1/4] drm/dsi: Add flag for continuous clock behavior Alexandre Courbot
2014-07-03 8:23 ` Andrzej Hajda
2014-07-04 5:57 ` Alexandre Courbot
2014-07-04 9:53 ` Andrzej Hajda [this message]
2014-07-06 9:30 ` Alexandre Courbot
2014-07-02 12:19 ` [PATCH 2/4] drm/tegra: dsi - Handle continuous clock flag Alexandre Courbot
2014-07-02 12:19 ` [PATCH 3/4] drm/panel: LG LH500WX1-SD03 uses continuous clock Alexandre Courbot
2014-07-02 12:19 ` [PATCH 4/4] ARM: tegra: roth: add display DT node Alexandre Courbot
2014-07-02 15:55 ` Stephen Warren
2014-07-03 3:10 ` Alexandre Courbot
2014-07-21 15:35 ` Stephen Warren
2014-07-21 21:16 ` Thierry Reding
2014-07-21 22:51 ` Mark Brown
2014-07-22 4:39 ` Alexandre Courbot
2014-07-22 9:45 ` Mark Brown
2014-07-03 3:15 ` [PATCH v2] " Alexandre Courbot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53B679A0.1060306@samsung.com \
--to=a.hajda@samsung.com \
--cc=acourbot@nvidia.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=gnurou@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
--cc=tbergstrom@nvidia.com \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).