public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	UML devel <user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
	linux-kbuild <linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH] checkstack: use $UTS_MACHINE as target architecture
Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2014 11:14:31 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53BBB677.2010401@nod.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdXczkVGAejZ2RnsdXYvTq-8eZAhheR-ygXmXKMmh9VsEA@mail.gmail.com>

Am 08.07.2014 11:09, schrieb Geert Uytterhoeven:
> On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 11:06 AM, Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> wrote:
>> Am 08.07.2014 11:03, schrieb Konstantin Khlebnikov:
>>> I know. But debugging/profiling of kernel code is much easier when it
>>> runs in userspace.
>>> I think this is the last use case where uml might beat normal hardware
>>> accelerated qemu/kvm.
>>> But without SMP and with that high overhead on each syscall and
>>> context/mm switch it's mostly useless.
>>
>> The major use case of UML is that you can run it on hardware without
>> KVM support.
>> Everyone else is using KVM.
> 
> And that you don't need root permissions to run it.
> Which is why I'm still interested in an ARM port.
> Need... More... Spare... Time...

You can use KVM also without being root.
It depends on the rights of /dev/kvm.

But yes, an ARM ports would be nice to have. :)

Thanks,
//richard

  reply	other threads:[~2014-07-08  9:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-05 11:22 [PATCH] checkstack: use $UTS_MACHINE as target architecture Konstantin Khlebnikov
2014-07-07 22:05 ` Andrew Morton
2014-07-08  5:48   ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2014-07-08  8:01     ` [uml-devel] " Richard Weinberger
2014-07-08  8:16       ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2014-07-08  8:20         ` Richard Weinberger
2014-07-08  8:30           ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2014-07-08  8:33             ` Richard Weinberger
2014-07-08  8:47               ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2014-07-08  8:50                 ` Richard Weinberger
2014-07-08  9:03                   ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2014-07-08  9:06                     ` Richard Weinberger
2014-07-08  9:09                       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2014-07-08  9:14                         ` Richard Weinberger [this message]
2014-07-08  9:22                           ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2014-07-08  9:23                             ` Richard Weinberger
2014-07-08 10:31     ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2014-07-08 10:35       ` [PATCH] scripts/checkstack.pl: automatically handle 32-bit and 64-bit mode for ARCH=x86 Konstantin Khlebnikov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53BBB677.2010401@nod.at \
    --to=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=koct9i@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox