From: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>
To: Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>,
linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"'Marek Szyprowski'" <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
"'Rob Herring'" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
"'Mark Rutland'" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
"'Pankaj Dubey'" <pankaj.dubey@samsung.com>,
"'Rahul Sharma'" <rahul.sharma@samsung.com>,
"'Mark Brown'" <broonie@kernel.org>,
"'Sylwester Nawrocki'" <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>,
"'Daniel Drake'" <drake@endlessm.com>,
"'Tomasz Figa'" <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Add support for Exynos clock output configuration
Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2014 16:04:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53BBFA61.1030602@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140703001452.7440.8476@quantum>
On 03.07.2014 02:14, Mike Turquette wrote:
> Quoting Kukjin Kim (2014-06-25 03:36:51)
>> Tomasz Figa wrote:
>>>
>> Hi Tomasz,
>>
>>> On all Exynos SoCs there is a dedicated CLKOUT pin that allows many of
>>> internal SoC clocks to be output from the SoC. The hardware structure
>>
>> Yeah, because the CLKOUT pin is used for measure of the clock for debug on all
>> of exynos SoCs commonly.
>>
>>> of CLKOUT related clocks looks as follows:
>>>
>>> CMU |---> clock0 ---------> | PMU |
>>> | | |
>>> several |---> clock1 ---------> | mux |
>>> muxes | | + |---> CLKOUT
>>> dividers | ... | gate |
>>> and gates | | |
>>> |---> clockN ---------> | |
>>>
>>> Since the block responsible for handling the pin is PMU, not CMU,
>>> a separate driver, that binds to PMU node is required and acquires
>>> all input clocks by standard DT clock look-up. This way we don't need
>>> any cross-IP block drivers and cross-driver register sharing or
>>> nodes for fake devices.
>>>
>> BTW, upcoming exynos5 SoCs have two muxs for CLKOUT and each mux is controlled
>> by CMU and PMU, so
>>
>> The mux1 for CLKOUT in CMU is used to decide which clock in each sub-domain
>> will be out and the mux2 in PMU is used to decide which sub-domain will be out
>> via CLKOUT. So I want you to consider of all of exynos SoCs including upcoming
>> SoCs.
>
> clkout for debug is very useful indeed. For SoCs with high speed clocks
> that I have worked with, I have often observed that the clkout logic
> introduces buffers or dividers. This is needed so that you can get a
> (relatively) clean clock signal on your oscilloscope. Otherwise that
> 2GHz ARM clk is just going to be noise ;-)
>
> These divider values can modeled in the clk framework. Do you know if
> you have such stuff on your chip?
I believe this is what I have already implemented in my series.
The final CLKOUT mux and gates are implemented by separate driver,
because they reside in another IP block, while per-domain CLKOUT
dividers along with muxes and gates are registered by normal SoC clock
driver, because they are part of the clock controller. See patch 2/4
adding the whole hierarchy for Exynos4 SoCs.
I don't have boards to test CLKOUT on Exynos5 SoCs, so they are up to
interested people.
Best regards,
Tomasz
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-08 14:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-24 16:08 [PATCH v2 0/4] Add support for Exynos clock output configuration Tomasz Figa
2014-06-24 16:08 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] clk: samsung: exynos4: Add missing CPU/DMC clock hierarchy Tomasz Figa
2014-06-24 16:08 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] clk: samsung: exynos4: Add CLKOUT " Tomasz Figa
2014-06-24 16:08 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] clk: samsung: Add driver to control CLKOUT line on Exynos SoCs Tomasz Figa
2014-06-24 16:08 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] ARM: dts: exynos: Update PMU node with CLKOUT related data Tomasz Figa
2014-06-25 8:56 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] Add support for Exynos clock output configuration Daniel Drake
2014-06-25 10:36 ` Kukjin Kim
2014-06-25 10:50 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-07-03 0:14 ` Mike Turquette
2014-07-08 14:04 ` Tomasz Figa [this message]
2014-07-09 16:53 ` Tomasz Figa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53BBFA61.1030602@samsung.com \
--to=t.figa@samsung.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=drake@endlessm.com \
--cc=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mturquette@linaro.org \
--cc=pankaj.dubey@samsung.com \
--cc=rahul.sharma@samsung.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=s.nawrocki@samsung.com \
--cc=tomasz.figa@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).