From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754126AbaGHPUk (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jul 2014 11:20:40 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:49545 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751709AbaGHPUh (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jul 2014 11:20:37 -0400 Message-ID: <53BC0C2B.4060604@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2014 17:20:11 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Gabriel L. Somlo" , KVM CC: "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Gleb Natapov , Eric Northup , Nadav Amit , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , the arch/x86 maintainers , Linux Kernel Mailing List , nadav.amit@gmail.com, joro@8bytes.org, agraf@suse.de Subject: Re: Ping: Re: [PATCH] Revert "kvm: x86: emulate monitor and mwait instructions as nop" References: <20140619135935.GG1695@ERROL.INI.CMU.EDU> <20140708151542.GF1688@ERROL.INI.CMU.EDU> In-Reply-To: <20140708151542.GF1688@ERROL.INI.CMU.EDU> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Il 08/07/2014 17:15, Gabriel L. Somlo ha scritto: > Any decision on this ? If we're going to revert monitor/mwait as nop, > it's hopefully not too late to avoid having it show up in an official > (3.16 ?) kernel release... I don't really see a reason to revert it. Paolo