From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>, <konrad@kernel.org>,
<boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 1/7] xen-pciback: Document the various parameters and attributes in SysFS
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2014 15:57:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53BD584B.2030005@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140709144744.GC27881@laptop.dumpdata.com>
On 09/07/14 15:47, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 03:45:03PM +0100, David Vrabel wrote:
>> On 09/07/14 15:25, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 03:22:30PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>>> On 09/07/14 15:13, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 03:05:56PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>>>>> On 09/07/14 14:59, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>>>>>>>>> +What: /sys/bus/pci/drivers/pciback/irq_handler_state
>>>>>>>>> +Date: Oct 2011
>>>>>>>>> +KernelVersion: 3.1
>>>>>>>>> +Contact: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
>>>>>>>>> +Description:
>>>>>>>>> + An option to toggle Xen PCI back to acknowledge (or stop)
>>>>>>>>> + interrupts for the specific device regardless of whether the
>>>>>>>>> + device is shared, enabled, or on a level interrupt line.
>>>>>>>>> + Writing a string of DDDD:BB:DD.F will toggle the state.
>>>>>>>>> + This is Domain:Bus:Device.Function where domain is optional.
>>>>>>>> I do not understand under what circumstances this should be used in.
>>>>>>> So that dom0 does not disable the IRQ line as it would be getting the IRQs
>>>>>>> for the guest as well (because the IRQ line is level and another guest
>>>>>>> uses an PCI device that is using the same line).
>>>>>> Why is this relevant? Xen (and Xen alone) actually controls this aspect
>>>>>> of interrupts. Xen manages passing line level interrupts to any domain
>>>>>> which might have a device hanging off a particular line, and has to wait
>>>>>> until all domains have EOI'd the line until it can clear the interrupt
>>>>>> at the IO-APIC.
>>>>> Because Linux will think there is an IRQ storm as the event->IRQ points
>>>>> to the default one. And then it will mask the event, which means dom0
>>>>> will mask the PIRQ, and Xen will then also mask the IRQ.
>>>>
>>>> Xen will (and by this I mean 'should', and this was the behaviour last
>>>> time I delved in there) only mask the IRQ if dom0 is the only consumer
>>>> of these interrupts.
>>>>
>>>> For any PCIPassthrough, dom0 will get line interrupts for passed-through
>>>> devices, but in this case pci-back should always handle the line
>>>> interrupts so Linux doesn't block them as an IRQ storm.
>>>
>>> And that is what it does - and this option provides the option to enable/disable
>>> it the system admin wishes to do it.
>>
>> I still don't understand why someone would want to flip the handler to
>> a broken mode.
>
> The intent was to allow you to flip to the 'enable' mode in case Linux
> did not detect it correctly.
We should not provide sysfs knobs to work around kernel bugs.
>> The original commit isn't very enlightening either.
>
> Thoughts then on what this documentation patch should say to make it
> clear of its intent?
I think it should be removed.
It also has non-standard behaviour of /toggling/ with every write
instead of using a write of a 1 or a 0 like every other sysfs file.
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-09 14:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-08 18:58 [PATCH] Xen PCIbackend support for slot and bus reset (v3) konrad
2014-07-08 18:58 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] xen-pciback: Document the various parameters and attributes in SysFS konrad
2014-07-08 18:18 ` [Xen-devel] " Andrew Cooper
2014-07-09 12:17 ` David Vrabel
2014-07-09 13:59 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-07-09 14:05 ` Andrew Cooper
2014-07-09 14:13 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-07-09 14:22 ` Andrew Cooper
2014-07-09 14:25 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-07-09 14:45 ` David Vrabel
2014-07-09 14:47 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-07-09 14:57 ` David Vrabel [this message]
2014-07-09 15:11 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-07-08 18:58 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] xen/pciback: Don't deadlock when unbinding konrad
2014-07-09 12:21 ` David Vrabel
2014-07-09 14:01 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-07-08 18:58 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] xen/pciback: Move the FLR code to a function konrad
2014-07-08 18:58 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] xen/pciback: Implement PCI reset slot or bus with 'do_flr' SysFS attribute konrad
2014-07-08 18:02 ` David Vrabel
2014-07-08 18:46 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-07-08 19:28 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-07-09 12:32 ` David Vrabel
2014-07-09 14:11 ` [Xen-devel] " David Vrabel
2014-07-09 14:12 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-07-09 14:26 ` David Vrabel
2014-07-09 15:07 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-07-08 18:17 ` [Xen-devel] " Andrew Cooper
2014-07-08 18:58 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] xen/pciback: Include the domain id if removing the device whilst still in use konrad
2014-07-09 12:34 ` David Vrabel
2014-07-08 18:58 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] xen/pciback: Print out the domain owning the device konrad
2014-07-09 13:04 ` David Vrabel
2014-07-08 18:58 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] xen/pciback: Remove tons of dereferences konrad
2014-07-08 19:15 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Xen PCIbackend support for slot and bus reset (v3) Sander Eikelenboom
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53BD584B.2030005@citrix.com \
--to=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=konrad@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox