From: Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>
To: "Gupta, Pekon" <pekon@ti.com>,
"tony@atomide.com" <tony@atomide.com>,
"computersforpeace@gmail.com" <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
Cc: "javier@dowhile0.org" <javier@dowhile0.org>,
"ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com"
<ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com>,
"dwmw2@infradead.org" <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
"jg1.han@samsung.com" <jg1.han@samsung.com>,
"Nori, Sekhar" <nsekhar@ti.com>,
"linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 02/10] mtd: nand: omap: Always use chip->ecc.steps for BCH sector count
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 13:35:38 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53BFBDFA.8040901@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20980858CB6D3A4BAE95CA194937D5E73EB01DF7@DBDE04.ent.ti.com>
On 07/11/2014 10:43 AM, Gupta, Pekon wrote:
>> From: Quadros, Roger
>>
>> Instead of hardcoding use the pre-calculated chip->ecc.steps for
>> configuring number of sectors to process with the BCH algorithm.
>>
>> This also avoids unnecessary access to the ECC_CONFIG register in
>> omap_calculate_ecc_bch().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c | 9 +++------
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c
>> index 5b8739c..6f3d7cd 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c
>> @@ -1066,10 +1066,10 @@ static void __maybe_unused omap_enable_hwecc_bch(struct mtd_info
>> *mtd, int mode)
>> unsigned int ecc_size1, ecc_size0;
>>
>> /* GPMC configurations for calculating ECC */
>> + nsectors = chip->ecc.steps;
>> switch (ecc_opt) {
>> case OMAP_ECC_BCH4_CODE_HW_DETECTION_SW:
>> bch_type = 0;
>> - nsectors = 1;
>> if (mode == NAND_ECC_READ) {
>> wr_mode = BCH_WRAPMODE_6;
>> ecc_size0 = BCH_ECC_SIZE0;
>> @@ -1082,7 +1082,6 @@ static void __maybe_unused omap_enable_hwecc_bch(struct mtd_info
>> *mtd, int mode)
>> break;
>> case OMAP_ECC_BCH4_CODE_HW:
>> bch_type = 0;
>> - nsectors = chip->ecc.steps;
>> if (mode == NAND_ECC_READ) {
>> wr_mode = BCH_WRAPMODE_1;
>> ecc_size0 = BCH4R_ECC_SIZE0;
>> @@ -1095,7 +1094,6 @@ static void __maybe_unused omap_enable_hwecc_bch(struct mtd_info
>> *mtd, int mode)
>> break;
>> case OMAP_ECC_BCH8_CODE_HW_DETECTION_SW:
>> bch_type = 1;
>> - nsectors = 1;
>> if (mode == NAND_ECC_READ) {
>> wr_mode = BCH_WRAPMODE_6;
>> ecc_size0 = BCH_ECC_SIZE0;
>> @@ -1108,7 +1106,6 @@ static void __maybe_unused omap_enable_hwecc_bch(struct mtd_info
>> *mtd, int mode)
>> break;
>> case OMAP_ECC_BCH8_CODE_HW:
>> bch_type = 1;
>> - nsectors = chip->ecc.steps;
>> if (mode == NAND_ECC_READ) {
>> wr_mode = BCH_WRAPMODE_1;
>> ecc_size0 = BCH8R_ECC_SIZE0;
>> @@ -1121,7 +1118,6 @@ static void __maybe_unused omap_enable_hwecc_bch(struct mtd_info
>> *mtd, int mode)
>> break;
>> case OMAP_ECC_BCH16_CODE_HW:
>> bch_type = 0x2;
>> - nsectors = chip->ecc.steps;
>> if (mode == NAND_ECC_READ) {
>> wr_mode = 0x01;
>> ecc_size0 = 52; /* ECC bits in nibbles per sector */
>> @@ -1176,6 +1172,7 @@ static int __maybe_unused omap_calculate_ecc_bch(struct mtd_info *mtd,
>> {
>> struct omap_nand_info *info = container_of(mtd, struct omap_nand_info,
>> mtd);
>> + struct nand_chip *chip = mtd->priv;
>> int eccbytes = info->nand.ecc.bytes;
>> struct gpmc_nand_regs *gpmc_regs = &info->reg;
>> u8 *ecc_code;
>> @@ -1183,7 +1180,7 @@ static int __maybe_unused omap_calculate_ecc_bch(struct mtd_info *mtd,
>> u32 val;
>> int i, j;
>>
>> - nsectors = ((readl(info->reg.gpmc_ecc_config) >> 4) & 0x7) + 1;
>> + nsectors = chip->ecc.steps;
>
> Sorry NAK.. I'm sure you are breaking something here :-)
>
> NAND driver supports multiple ECC schemes like;
> OMAP_ECC_CODE_HAM1_HW (support for legacy reasons)
> OMAP_ECC_CODE_BCH4_HW_DETECTION_SW (needed for OMAP3 and AM35xx)
> OMAP_ECC_CODE_BCH4_HW
> OMAP_ECC_CODE_BCH8_HW
> OMAP_ECC_CODE_BCH8_HW_DETECTION_SW (needed for OMAP3 and AM35xx)
> OMAP_ECC_CODE_BCH16_HW
>
> IIRC ..
> - software based ecc-schemes OMAP_ECC_CODE_BCHx_HW_DETECTION_SW
> Reads/Write in per-sector granularity. (here nsector != chip->ecc.steps)
OK. I still don't have a full understanding about the ECC schemes so to ensure we
don't break anything I can just leave nsectors as it is and probably just store a
copy of it in omap_nand_info to avoid reading it back from gpmc_ecc_config.
I still have a few questions to clarify my understanding.
The only difference between OMAP_ECC_CODE_BCHx_HW_DETECTION_SW and
OMAP_ECC_CODE_BCHx_HW is that in the former the _correction_ is done by software
and in the latter the _correction_ is done by hardware (i.e. ELM module).
In both cases the _detection_ is done by the same hardware IP via ecc.calculate(),
i.e. omap_calculate_ecc_bch().
so why should nsector be different for both in the _detection_ stage?
An I right that ecc_steps is nothing but number of sub-blocks ECC calculation and correction
needs to be done for larger pages. This is a function of ECC hw capability (chip->ecc.size)
and NAND flash capability (mtd->writesize). i.e. ecc_steps = mtd->writesize / chip->ecc.size
We hardcode chip->ecc.size to 512 for all the ECC schemes in omap_nand_probe() so
calculate and correct will always be called for 512 byte sized blocks. So when does
the usecase for nsector > 1 come in?
cheers,
-roger
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-11 10:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-09 12:37 [RFC PATCH 00/10] OMAP: GPMC: NAND: Introduce GPMC APIs for OMAP NAND Roger Quadros
2014-07-09 12:37 ` [RFC PATCH 01/10] mtd: nand: omap: Use a single hardware controller instance Roger Quadros
2014-07-09 12:37 ` [RFC PATCH 02/10] mtd: nand: omap: Always use chip->ecc.steps for BCH sector count Roger Quadros
2014-07-11 7:43 ` Gupta, Pekon
2014-07-11 10:35 ` Roger Quadros [this message]
2014-07-11 11:27 ` Gupta, Pekon
2014-07-11 11:51 ` Roger Quadros
2014-07-09 12:37 ` [RFC PATCH 03/10] OMAP: GPMC: Introduce APIs to access NAND control registers Roger Quadros
2014-07-09 12:37 ` [RFC PATCH 04/10] mtd: nand: omap: Use GPMC APIs for NAND control Roger Quadros
2014-07-09 12:37 ` [RFC PATCH 05/10] OMAP: GPMC: Introduce APIs for accessing Prefetch/Write-post engine Roger Quadros
2014-07-09 12:37 ` [RFC PATCH 06/10] mtd: nand: omap: Use GPMC APIs for accessing Prefetch engine Roger Quadros
2014-07-09 12:37 ` [RFC PATCH 07/10] OMAP: GPMC: Introduce APIs for Configuring ECC Engine Roger Quadros
2014-07-11 7:54 ` Gupta, Pekon
2014-07-09 12:37 ` [RFC PATCH 08/10] OMAP: GPMC: Introduce APIs to get ECC/BCH results Roger Quadros
2014-07-09 12:37 ` [RFC PATCH 09/10] mtd: nand: omap: Use GPMC APIs for accessing ECC/BCH engine Roger Quadros
2014-07-11 7:56 ` Gupta, Pekon
2014-07-09 12:37 ` [RFC PATCH 10/10] OMAP: GPMC: NAND: Don't pass NAND/ECC/BCH register adresses to NAND driver Roger Quadros
2014-07-11 6:52 ` [RFC PATCH 00/10] OMAP: GPMC: NAND: Introduce GPMC APIs for OMAP NAND Tony Lindgren
2014-07-11 7:27 ` Gupta, Pekon
2014-07-11 8:28 ` Roger Quadros
2014-07-11 9:42 ` Gupta, Pekon
2014-07-11 10:23 ` Roger Quadros
2014-07-29 10:39 ` Tony Lindgren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53BFBDFA.8040901@ti.com \
--to=rogerq@ti.com \
--cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com \
--cc=javier@dowhile0.org \
--cc=jg1.han@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nsekhar@ti.com \
--cc=pekon@ti.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox