From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754159AbaGKV7m (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jul 2014 17:59:42 -0400 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.11.231]:59131 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750723AbaGKV7k (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jul 2014 17:59:40 -0400 Message-ID: <53C05E4A.2030708@codeaurora.org> Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 14:59:38 -0700 From: Stephen Boyd User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130329 Thunderbird/17.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Thierry Reding CC: Russell King , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Arnd Bergmann , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Ben Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] asm-generic/io.h: Implement generic {read,write}s*() References: <1405092672-18549-1-git-send-email-thierry.reding@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1405092672-18549-1-git-send-email-thierry.reding@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 07/11/14 08:31, Thierry Reding wrote: > From: Thierry Reding > > This patch implements generic versions of readsb(), readsw(), readsl(), > readsq(), writesb(), writesw(), writesl() and writesq(). Variants of > these string functions for I/O accesses (ins*() and outs*() as well as > ioread*_rep() and iowrite*_rep()) are now implemented in terms of the > new functions. > > While at it, also make sure that any of the functions provided as > fallback for architectures that don't override them can't be overridden > subsequently. > > This is compile- and runtime-tested on 32-bit and 64-bit ARM and compile > tested on Microblaze, s390, SPARC and Xtensa. For ARC, Blackfin, Metag, > OpenRISC, Score and Unicore32 which also use asm-generic/io.h I couldn't > find or build a cross-compiler that would run on my system. But by code > inspection they shouldn't break with this patch. > > Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding There isn't any mention of why we're doing this in the commit text. It looks like patch 2 and 3 sort of mention why. I also wonder if it could be explained how this about turn is desired, given that patch b2656a138ab7 (asm-generic: io: remove {read,write} string functions, 2012-10-17) did the complete opposite. Can you please explain? -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation