Re: Ping: Re: [PATCH v2] x86, vsmp: Remove is_vsmp_box() from apic_is_clustered_box()

[Oren Twaig <oren@scalemp.com>]

I see - thanks.

BTW, the v2 was sent because I had a mailer send-as-text issues which caused
the patch not to be sent properly and you had some conflicts with it when
merging.

All should be good now with the v2.

Thanks,
Oren.
On 7/13/2014 7:40 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Yes, although sometimes pings we useful to keep things from getting lost.  Typically 1-2 weeks without response is a good reason to ping.  *Don't repost*, just put a ping as a reply to the original 0/ patch, which in most threaded mail readers brings the thread back to the front.
>
> Sent from my tablet, pardon any formatting problems.
>
>> On Jul 13, 2014, at 2:10, Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> wrote:
>>
>> Am 13.07.2014 08:51, schrieb Oren Twaig:
>>> ping
>>> On 07/06/2014 09:33 AM, Oren Twaig wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Quick question: As I'm new at this (submitting patches), what is a reasonable
>>>> time to wait before ping-ing a patch ?
>>>>
>>>> Oren.
>> AFACT Peter is still crawling through his mail backlog to catch up.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> //richard
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>



---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
http://www.avast.com