[PATCH] drivers: staging: lustre: Use 'force_die' instead of 'die' to avoid compiling issue

[PATCH] drivers: staging: lustre: Use 'force_die' instead of 'die' to avoid compiling issue

[Chen Gang]

Some of architectures have already defined 'die' as macro, so can not use
this common name as declaration in other modules, or will cause compiling
issue. So use more precise name 'force_die' (like 'wrap_bulk') instead of.

The related error (with allmodconfig under score):

    CC [M]  drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec.o
  drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec.c: In function 'sptlrpc_cli_ctx_expire':
  drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec.c:309:13: error: 'struct ptlrpc_ctx_ops' has no member named '__die'
    ctx->cc_ops->die(ctx, 0);
               ^
  drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec.c: In function 'ctx_refresh_timeout':
  drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec.c:594:26: error: 'struct ptlrpc_ctx_ops' has no member named '__die'
     req->rq_cli_ctx->cc_ops->die(req->rq_cli_ctx, 0);
                            ^
  make[5]: *** [drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec.o] Error 1
  make[4]: *** [drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc] Error 2
  make[3]: *** [drivers/staging/lustre/lustre] Error 2
  make[2]: *** [drivers/staging/lustre] Error 2
  make[1]: *** [drivers/staging] Error 2
  make: *** [drivers] Error 2


Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre_sec.h | 2 +-
 drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec.c         | 6 +++---
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre_sec.h b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre_sec.h
index 50d2f01..1b8ec11 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre_sec.h
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre_sec.h
@@ -387,7 +387,7 @@ struct ptlrpc_ctx_ops {
 	/**
 	 * Force the \a ctx to die.
 	 */
-	void    (*die)       (struct ptlrpc_cli_ctx *ctx,
+	void    (*force_die)   (struct ptlrpc_cli_ctx *ctx,
 				int grace);
 	int     (*display)     (struct ptlrpc_cli_ctx *ctx,
 				char *buf, int bufsize);
diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec.c
index 28ac824..bb5b4b6 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec.c
@@ -305,8 +305,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(sptlrpc_cli_ctx_put);
  */
 void sptlrpc_cli_ctx_expire(struct ptlrpc_cli_ctx *ctx)
 {
-	LASSERT(ctx->cc_ops->die);
-	ctx->cc_ops->die(ctx, 0);
+	LASSERT(ctx->cc_ops->force_die);
+	ctx->cc_ops->force_die(ctx, 0);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(sptlrpc_cli_ctx_expire);
 
@@ -591,7 +591,7 @@ int ctx_refresh_timeout(void *data)
 	 * later than the context refresh expire time.
 	 */
 	if (rc == 0)
-		req->rq_cli_ctx->cc_ops->die(req->rq_cli_ctx, 0);
+		req->rq_cli_ctx->cc_ops->force_die(req->rq_cli_ctx, 0);
 	return rc;
 }
 
-- 
1.7.11.7

Re: [PATCH] drivers: staging: lustre: Use 'force_die' instead of 'die' to avoid compiling issue

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 10:50:55PM +0800, Chen Gang wrote:
> Some of architectures have already defined 'die' as macro, so can not use
> this common name as declaration in other modules, or will cause compiling
> issue. So use more precise name 'force_die' (like 'wrap_bulk') instead of.
> 
> The related error (with allmodconfig under score):
> 
>     CC [M]  drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec.o
>   drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec.c: In function 'sptlrpc_cli_ctx_expire':
>   drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec.c:309:13: error: 'struct ptlrpc_ctx_ops' has no member named '__die'
>     ctx->cc_ops->die(ctx, 0);
>                ^
>   drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec.c: In function 'ctx_refresh_timeout':
>   drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec.c:594:26: error: 'struct ptlrpc_ctx_ops' has no member named '__die'
>      req->rq_cli_ctx->cc_ops->die(req->rq_cli_ctx, 0);
>                             ^
>   make[5]: *** [drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec.o] Error 1
>   make[4]: *** [drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc] Error 2
>   make[3]: *** [drivers/staging/lustre/lustre] Error 2
>   make[2]: *** [drivers/staging/lustre] Error 2
>   make[1]: *** [drivers/staging] Error 2
>   make: *** [drivers] Error 2
> 
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre_sec.h | 2 +-
>  drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec.c         | 6 +++---
>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

This doesn't apply to my tree, can you please refresh it against the
staging-next branch of staging.git so that I can apply it?

thanks,

greg k-h

Re: [PATCH] drivers: staging: lustre: Use 'force_die' instead of 'die' to avoid compiling issue

[Chen Gang]

On 07/14/2014 03:05 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 10:50:55PM +0800, Chen Gang wrote:
>> Some of architectures have already defined 'die' as macro, so can not use
>> this common name as declaration in other modules, or will cause compiling
>> issue. So use more precise name 'force_die' (like 'wrap_bulk') instead of.
>>
>> The related error (with allmodconfig under score):
>>
>>     CC [M]  drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec.o
>>   drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec.c: In function 'sptlrpc_cli_ctx_expire':
>>   drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec.c:309:13: error: 'struct ptlrpc_ctx_ops' has no member named '__die'
>>     ctx->cc_ops->die(ctx, 0);
>>                ^
>>   drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec.c: In function 'ctx_refresh_timeout':
>>   drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec.c:594:26: error: 'struct ptlrpc_ctx_ops' has no member named '__die'
>>      req->rq_cli_ctx->cc_ops->die(req->rq_cli_ctx, 0);
>>                             ^
>>   make[5]: *** [drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec.o] Error 1
>>   make[4]: *** [drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc] Error 2
>>   make[3]: *** [drivers/staging/lustre/lustre] Error 2
>>   make[2]: *** [drivers/staging/lustre] Error 2
>>   make[1]: *** [drivers/staging] Error 2
>>   make: *** [drivers] Error 2
>>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre_sec.h | 2 +-
>>  drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec.c         | 6 +++---
>>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> This doesn't apply to my tree, can you please refresh it against the
> staging-next branch of staging.git so that I can apply it?
> 

OK, I shall go to that tree and send patch for it (I shall finish within
2 days).

Thanks.
-- 
Chen Gang

Open share and attitude like air water and life which God blessed

Re: [PATCH] drivers: staging: lustre: Use 'force_die' instead of 'die' to avoid compiling issue

[Chen Gang]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2167 bytes --]

On 07/14/2014 05:41 AM, Chen Gang wrote:
> On 07/14/2014 03:05 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 10:50:55PM +0800, Chen Gang wrote:
>>> Some of architectures have already defined 'die' as macro, so can not use
>>> this common name as declaration in other modules, or will cause compiling
>>> issue. So use more precise name 'force_die' (like 'wrap_bulk') instead of.
>>>
>>> The related error (with allmodconfig under score):
>>>
>>>     CC [M]  drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec.o
>>>   drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec.c: In function 'sptlrpc_cli_ctx_expire':
>>>   drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec.c:309:13: error: 'struct ptlrpc_ctx_ops' has no member named '__die'
>>>     ctx->cc_ops->die(ctx, 0);
>>>                ^
>>>   drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec.c: In function 'ctx_refresh_timeout':
>>>   drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec.c:594:26: error: 'struct ptlrpc_ctx_ops' has no member named '__die'
>>>      req->rq_cli_ctx->cc_ops->die(req->rq_cli_ctx, 0);
>>>                             ^
>>>   make[5]: *** [drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec.o] Error 1
>>>   make[4]: *** [drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc] Error 2
>>>   make[3]: *** [drivers/staging/lustre/lustre] Error 2
>>>   make[2]: *** [drivers/staging/lustre] Error 2
>>>   make[1]: *** [drivers/staging] Error 2
>>>   make: *** [drivers] Error 2
>>>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@gmail.com>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre_sec.h | 2 +-
>>>  drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec.c         | 6 +++---
>>>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> This doesn't apply to my tree, can you please refresh it against the
>> staging-next branch of staging.git so that I can apply it?
>>


After checkout, I get the same patch, the related git link:

  "git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/staging.git".

The related new patch is in attachment, please check, thanks.


> 
> OK, I shall go to that tree and send patch for it (I shall finish within
> 2 days).


Thanks.
-- 
Chen Gang

Open share and attitude like air water and life which God blessed

[-- Attachment #2: 0001-drivers-staging-lustre-Use-force_die-instead-of-die-.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 2985 bytes --]

>From 2c5239e3f52206f7a54814d39fc42aed4afe788f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 06:21:57 +0800
Subject: [PATCH v2] drivers: staging: lustre: Use 'force_die' instead of 'die' to avoid compiling issue

Some of architectures have already defined 'die' as macro, so can not use
this common name as declaration in other modules, or will cause compiling
issue. So use more precise name 'force_die' (like 'wrap_bulk') instead of.

The related error (with allmodconfig under score):

    CC [M]  drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec.o
  drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec.c: In function 'sptlrpc_cli_ctx_expire':
  drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec.c:309:13: error: 'struct ptlrpc_ctx_ops' has no member named '__die'
    ctx->cc_ops->die(ctx, 0);
               ^
  drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec.c: In function 'ctx_refresh_timeout':
  drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec.c:594:26: error: 'struct ptlrpc_ctx_ops' has no member named '__die'
     req->rq_cli_ctx->cc_ops->die(req->rq_cli_ctx, 0);
                            ^
  make[5]: *** [drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec.o] Error 1
  make[4]: *** [drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc] Error 2
  make[3]: *** [drivers/staging/lustre/lustre] Error 2
  make[2]: *** [drivers/staging/lustre] Error 2
  make[1]: *** [drivers/staging] Error 2
  make: *** [drivers] Error 2


Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre_sec.h | 2 +-
 drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec.c         | 6 +++---
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre_sec.h b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre_sec.h
index bf3ee39..1b8ec11 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre_sec.h
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre_sec.h
@@ -387,7 +387,7 @@ struct ptlrpc_ctx_ops {
 	/**
 	 * Force the \a ctx to die.
 	 */
-	void    (*die)	 (struct ptlrpc_cli_ctx *ctx,
+	void    (*force_die)   (struct ptlrpc_cli_ctx *ctx,
 				int grace);
 	int     (*display)     (struct ptlrpc_cli_ctx *ctx,
 				char *buf, int bufsize);
diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec.c
index 28ac824..bb5b4b6 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec.c
@@ -305,8 +305,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(sptlrpc_cli_ctx_put);
  */
 void sptlrpc_cli_ctx_expire(struct ptlrpc_cli_ctx *ctx)
 {
-	LASSERT(ctx->cc_ops->die);
-	ctx->cc_ops->die(ctx, 0);
+	LASSERT(ctx->cc_ops->force_die);
+	ctx->cc_ops->force_die(ctx, 0);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(sptlrpc_cli_ctx_expire);
 
@@ -591,7 +591,7 @@ int ctx_refresh_timeout(void *data)
 	 * later than the context refresh expire time.
 	 */
 	if (rc == 0)
-		req->rq_cli_ctx->cc_ops->die(req->rq_cli_ctx, 0);
+		req->rq_cli_ctx->cc_ops->force_die(req->rq_cli_ctx, 0);
 	return rc;
 }
 
-- 
1.7.11.7

Re: [PATCH] drivers: staging: lustre: Use 'force_die' instead of 'die' to avoid compiling issue

[Chen Gang]

On 07/14/2014 06:31 AM, Chen Gang wrote:
> On 07/14/2014 05:41 AM, Chen Gang wrote:
>> On 07/14/2014 03:05 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>> On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 10:50:55PM +0800, Chen Gang wrote:
>>>> Some of architectures have already defined 'die' as macro, so can not use
>>>> this common name as declaration in other modules, or will cause compiling
>>>> issue. So use more precise name 'force_die' (like 'wrap_bulk') instead of.
>>>>
>>>> The related error (with allmodconfig under score):
>>>>
>>>>     CC [M]  drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec.o
>>>>   drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec.c: In function 'sptlrpc_cli_ctx_expire':
>>>>   drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec.c:309:13: error: 'struct ptlrpc_ctx_ops' has no member named '__die'
>>>>     ctx->cc_ops->die(ctx, 0);
>>>>                ^
>>>>   drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec.c: In function 'ctx_refresh_timeout':
>>>>   drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec.c:594:26: error: 'struct ptlrpc_ctx_ops' has no member named '__die'
>>>>      req->rq_cli_ctx->cc_ops->die(req->rq_cli_ctx, 0);
>>>>                             ^
>>>>   make[5]: *** [drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec.o] Error 1
>>>>   make[4]: *** [drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc] Error 2
>>>>   make[3]: *** [drivers/staging/lustre/lustre] Error 2
>>>>   make[2]: *** [drivers/staging/lustre] Error 2
>>>>   make[1]: *** [drivers/staging] Error 2
>>>>   make: *** [drivers] Error 2
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@gmail.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>  drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre_sec.h | 2 +-
>>>>  drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec.c         | 6 +++---
>>>>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> This doesn't apply to my tree, can you please refresh it against the
>>> staging-next branch of staging.git so that I can apply it?
>>>
> 
> 
> After checkout, I get the same patch, the related git link:
> 
>   "git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/staging.git".

Oh, sorry, maybe I need:

  "git clone -b staging-next git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/staging.git"

And I shall try again, and finish within 2 days.

Thanks.

> 
> The related new patch is in attachment, please check, thanks.
> 
> 
>>
>> OK, I shall go to that tree and send patch for it (I shall finish within
>> 2 days).
> 
> 
> Thanks.
> 


-- 
Chen Gang

Open share and attitude like air water and life which God blessed

Re: [PATCH] drivers: staging: lustre: Use 'force_die' instead of 'die' to avoid compiling issue

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 06:38:24AM +0800, Chen Gang wrote:
> On 07/14/2014 06:31 AM, Chen Gang wrote:
> > On 07/14/2014 05:41 AM, Chen Gang wrote:
> >> On 07/14/2014 03:05 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >>> On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 10:50:55PM +0800, Chen Gang wrote:
> >>>> Some of architectures have already defined 'die' as macro, so can not use
> >>>> this common name as declaration in other modules, or will cause compiling
> >>>> issue. So use more precise name 'force_die' (like 'wrap_bulk') instead of.
> >>>>
> >>>> The related error (with allmodconfig under score):
> >>>>
> >>>>     CC [M]  drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec.o
> >>>>   drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec.c: In function 'sptlrpc_cli_ctx_expire':
> >>>>   drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec.c:309:13: error: 'struct ptlrpc_ctx_ops' has no member named '__die'
> >>>>     ctx->cc_ops->die(ctx, 0);
> >>>>                ^
> >>>>   drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec.c: In function 'ctx_refresh_timeout':
> >>>>   drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec.c:594:26: error: 'struct ptlrpc_ctx_ops' has no member named '__die'
> >>>>      req->rq_cli_ctx->cc_ops->die(req->rq_cli_ctx, 0);
> >>>>                             ^
> >>>>   make[5]: *** [drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec.o] Error 1
> >>>>   make[4]: *** [drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc] Error 2
> >>>>   make[3]: *** [drivers/staging/lustre/lustre] Error 2
> >>>>   make[2]: *** [drivers/staging/lustre] Error 2
> >>>>   make[1]: *** [drivers/staging] Error 2
> >>>>   make: *** [drivers] Error 2
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@gmail.com>
> >>>> ---
> >>>>  drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre_sec.h | 2 +-
> >>>>  drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec.c         | 6 +++---
> >>>>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> This doesn't apply to my tree, can you please refresh it against the
> >>> staging-next branch of staging.git so that I can apply it?
> >>>
> > 
> > 
> > After checkout, I get the same patch, the related git link:
> > 
> >   "git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/staging.git".
> 
> Oh, sorry, maybe I need:
> 
>   "git clone -b staging-next git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/staging.git"
> 
> And I shall try again, and finish within 2 days.

Yes, you need the staging-next branch.

You can take your original clone of:
	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/staging.git

and then just check out the staging-next branch in it:
	git checkout -t -b staging-next origin/staging-next

no need to do another full clone.

thanks,

greg k-h

Re: [PATCH] drivers: staging: lustre: Use 'force_die' instead of 'die' to avoid compiling issue

[Chen Gang]

On 07/14/2014 06:50 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 06:38:24AM +0800, Chen Gang wrote:
>> On 07/14/2014 06:31 AM, Chen Gang wrote:
>>> On 07/14/2014 05:41 AM, Chen Gang wrote:
>>>> On 07/14/2014 03:05 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 10:50:55PM +0800, Chen Gang wrote:
>>>>>> Some of architectures have already defined 'die' as macro, so can not use
>>>>>> this common name as declaration in other modules, or will cause compiling
>>>>>> issue. So use more precise name 'force_die' (like 'wrap_bulk') instead of.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The related error (with allmodconfig under score):
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     CC [M]  drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec.o
>>>>>>   drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec.c: In function 'sptlrpc_cli_ctx_expire':
>>>>>>   drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec.c:309:13: error: 'struct ptlrpc_ctx_ops' has no member named '__die'
>>>>>>     ctx->cc_ops->die(ctx, 0);
>>>>>>                ^
>>>>>>   drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec.c: In function 'ctx_refresh_timeout':
>>>>>>   drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec.c:594:26: error: 'struct ptlrpc_ctx_ops' has no member named '__die'
>>>>>>      req->rq_cli_ctx->cc_ops->die(req->rq_cli_ctx, 0);
>>>>>>                             ^
>>>>>>   make[5]: *** [drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec.o] Error 1
>>>>>>   make[4]: *** [drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc] Error 2
>>>>>>   make[3]: *** [drivers/staging/lustre/lustre] Error 2
>>>>>>   make[2]: *** [drivers/staging/lustre] Error 2
>>>>>>   make[1]: *** [drivers/staging] Error 2
>>>>>>   make: *** [drivers] Error 2
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@gmail.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>  drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre_sec.h | 2 +-
>>>>>>  drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec.c         | 6 +++---
>>>>>>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> This doesn't apply to my tree, can you please refresh it against the
>>>>> staging-next branch of staging.git so that I can apply it?
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> After checkout, I get the same patch, the related git link:
>>>
>>>   "git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/staging.git".
>>
>> Oh, sorry, maybe I need:
>>
>>   "git clone -b staging-next git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/staging.git"
>>
>> And I shall try again, and finish within 2 days.
> 
> Yes, you need the staging-next branch.
> 
> You can take your original clone of:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/staging.git
> 
> and then just check out the staging-next branch in it:
> 	git checkout -t -b staging-next origin/staging-next
> 
> no need to do another full clone.
> 

OK, thanks. I will finish it within this night (Chinese region).

Thanks.
-- 
Chen Gang

Open share and attitude like air water and life which God blessed