Hi, Since you have only one attribute, it is working for you. There is a dereference error in *channels. Check the attached diff, which will fix this. Thanks, Srinivas On 07/09/2014 03:12 PM, Reyad Attiyat wrote: > Hey Srinivas, > > I did look into the panic you sent. I wasn't sure exactly what caused > the NULL pointer. > I tested it with out applying the last rotation from north patch, so > no hid usages are found, my device only has rotation_from_north, and > hid_parse_report() would return -EINVAL. > I added another check to make sure a iio channel were set up, and > return -EINVAL if not, but couldn't think of anything else. > > Could you test this version with dynamic debugging and see if it is > finding any hid usage attributes. > Any ideas what could cause this? I think I'm handling errors properly > by returning what parse_report returns (-EINVAL or -ENOMEM) in probe > > Thanks, > Reyad Attiyat > > On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 2:45 PM, Srinivas Pandruvada > wrote: >> On 07/09/2014 12:30 PM, Reyad Attiyat wrote: >>> This series of patches modifies magn-3d driver to handle the rotation >>> from north usage. This is done by scanning the report and then building >>> the iio arrays (vals and channels) dynamically. >>> >>> Changes from V4 >>> I use the address field of struct iio_chan_spec to hold the array index >>> of the usage attribute. The scan_index field is generated when creating >>> an iio channel. >>> >>> Reyad Attiyat (4): >>> iio: Documentation: Add documentation for rotation from north sensor >>> usage attributes >>> iio: types: Added support for rotation from north usage attributes >>> iio: hid-sensor-magn-3d: Scan for usage attributes before setting up >>> iio channels >>> iio: hid-sensor-magn-3d: Add support for rotation from north >>> >>> Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-iio | 82 +++++++++++ >>> drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c | 4 + >>> drivers/iio/magnetometer/hid-sensor-magn-3d.c | 199 >>> ++++++++++++++++++++------ >>> include/linux/iio/types.h | 4 + >>> 4 files changed, 245 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-) >>> >> Did you get chance to look at the cause of panic? >> >> Thanks, >> Srinivas